Hi Luc, all.<br>Yes, it works properly.<br>I have tested it with a file that I generated from a workflow execution using the Wings opm-prov export :)<br>It has been converted successfully to svg, tutle, prov-n, etc. The visualization looks awesome.<br>
However, all the relations I use are not qualified (just binary assertions). <br><br>The error I was referring to can be found in the link I sent in my previous mail:<br><a href="http://provenance.ecs.soton.ac.uk:7000/prov-vservice-0.1.0/validation/graph2964166829492130347/validation#display-provenance-tab">http://provenance.ecs.soton.ac.uk:7000/prov-vservice-0.1.0/validation/graph2964166829492130347/validation#display-provenance-tab</a><br>
It happens when I hit the "PROV" button under the "Deposit your graph"<br><br>Best,<br>Daniel<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/12/18 Luc Moreau <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk" target="_blank">l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi Daniel,<br>
<br>
Thanks for your input. <br>
<br>
Yes, I am aware that the user doesn't know what has been
read/understood by the validator.<br>
Can you try the translator and check whether your ttl file
translates correctly to another prov<br>
representation or svg?<br>
<br>
What do you mean about the prov-link parsing error. What do you get?<br>
<br>
Luc<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 12/18/2012 08:54 AM, Daniel Garijo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Dear PROV validator team.<br>
I have been doing a couple of tests on the tool and here are my
comments:<br>
<ul>
<li>I like the interface. It is simple and easy to use.<br>
</li>
<li>I have tried to upload a ttl file that has some correct
provenance assertions. But I don't quite understand<br>
the response I'm obtaining. I get all the boxes in green with
the ticks as if they were right. Despite the fact of being
able to<br>
click on them, nothing happens. I would like to know what a
tick on the "Malformed Expressions" mean, or<br>
what does it mean to have a tick in the "Misleading qualified
names" (none are being used). Is it good or bad?<br>
</li>
<li>I get the same response from submitting a complete .ttl file
and an empty file. Is the service on? (It also happens with <br>
a file without prov statements)</li>
<li>When I click on the PROV link in the response I get a
parsing error: <br>
<a href="http://provenance.ecs.soton.ac.uk:7000/prov-vservice-0.1.0/validation/graph2964166829492130347/validation#display-provenance-tab" target="_blank">http://provenance.ecs.soton.ac.uk:7000/prov-vservice-0.1.0/validation/graph2964166829492130347/validation#display-provenance-tab</a><br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Suggestions:</p>
<ul>
<li>An explanation as in <a href="http://oeg-lia3.dia.fi.upm.es/oops/" target="_blank">http://oeg-lia3.dia.fi.upm.es/oops/</a>
would be useful: they say a small definition of what they have
checked<br>
and the elements where it's failing. I would recommend that to
clarify what is being analyzed.</li>
<li>The report should be expanded on demand, IMO. It also
contains information that I cannot navigate, or fthat I can't
uderstand, like:<br>
<span>vsi:e/b06c5824-7273-4c8f-85a5-23950bed205b</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Daniel Garijo<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><pre cols="72">--
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science tel: <a href="tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487" value="+442380594487" target="_blank">+44 23 8059 4487</a>
University of Southampton fax: <a href="tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865" value="+442380592865" target="_blank">+44 23 8059 2865</a>
Southampton SO17 1BJ email: <a href="mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk" target="_blank">l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk</a>
United Kingdom <a href="http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm" target="_blank">http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm</a>
</pre>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br>