[Provenance-Tech] Re: Comments about the PROV validator

[Daniel Garijo]

Hi Luc, all.
Yes, it works properly.
I have tested it with a file that I generated from a workflow execution
using the Wings opm-prov export :)
It has been converted successfully to svg, tutle, prov-n, etc. The
visualization looks awesome.
However, all the relations I use are not qualified (just binary
assertions).

The error I was referring to can be found in the link I sent in my previous
mail:
http://provenance.ecs.soton.ac.uk:7000/prov-vservice-0.1.0/validation/graph2964166829492130347/validation#display-provenance-tab
It happens when I hit the "PROV" button under the "Deposit your graph"

Best,
Daniel

2012/12/18 Luc Moreau <l.moreau at ecs.soton.ac.uk>

>  Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> Yes, I am aware that the user doesn't know what has been read/understood
> by the validator.
> Can you try the translator and check whether your ttl file translates
> correctly to another prov
> representation or svg?
>
> What do you mean about the prov-link parsing error. What do you get?
>
> Luc
>
>
>
> On 12/18/2012 08:54 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>
> Dear PROV validator team.
> I have been doing a couple of tests on the tool and here are my comments:
>
>    - I like the interface. It is simple and easy to use.
>     - I have tried to upload a ttl file that has some correct provenance
>    assertions. But I don't quite understand
>    the response I'm obtaining. I get all the boxes in green with the
>    ticks as if they were right. Despite the fact of being able to
>    click on them, nothing happens. I would like to know what a tick on
>    the "Malformed Expressions" mean, or
>    what does it mean to have a tick in the "Misleading qualified names"
>    (none are being used). Is it good or bad?
>     - I get the same response from submitting a complete .ttl file and an
>    empty file. Is the service on? (It also happens with
>    a file without prov statements)
>    - When I click on the PROV link in the response I get a parsing error:
>
>    http://provenance.ecs.soton.ac.uk:7000/prov-vservice-0.1.0/validation/graph2964166829492130347/validation#display-provenance-tab
>
> Suggestions:
>
>    - An explanation as in http://oeg-lia3.dia.fi.upm.es/oops/ would be
>    useful: they say a small definition of what they have checked
>    and the elements where it's failing. I would recommend that to clarify
>    what is being analyzed.
>    - The report should be expanded on demand, IMO. It also contains
>    information that I cannot navigate, or fthat I can't uderstand, like:
>    vsi:e/b06c5824-7273-4c8f-85a5-23950bed205b
>
> Best,
>
> Daniel Garijo
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/provenance-tech/attachments/20121220/be398dd4/attachment.html