[provenance-challenge] Re: change proposals for OPM v1.1: vote results

[Simon Miles]

Luc,

> Please check that no mistake has been made.

Looks correct to me, thanks.

I found many of the debates interesting in themselves, as well as
helpful in understanding others' perspectives on OPM.  Even where I
disagree, I enjoy it :)

For the "Work to continue" proposals, do you think we should continue
working on them as change proposals or should we set up separate
discussion Wiki pages unrelated to the community process of modifying
the spec?  I'm not sure when we will start considering OPM v1.2, but
it may be a while before the Dublin Core profile is widely enough
adopted to be endorsed so perhaps it makes no sense to treat it as a
change proposal yet.

Thanks,
Simon

2009/9/25 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau at ecs.soton.ac.uk>:
>
>
> Thanks for all your votes.  They are summarised at
> http://twiki.ipaw.info/bin/view/OPM/WorkInProgressV1pt1
>
> Please check that no mistake has been made. In the spirit of the OPM
> governance,
> we are aiming at reaching consensus, and where appropriate, the
> recommendation is
> to further work on some proposals.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>



-- 
Dr Simon Miles
Lecturer, Department of Computer Science
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166