[provenance-challenge] Re: PC3: one detail

Yogesh Simmhan yoges at microsoft.com
Fri Mar 20 14:36:01 GMT 2009


Hi Paolo:

Nope, that's a bug! The job IDs should be the same in the input parameters. i.e.

PC3\Java\build:xml
76:    <arg value="J062942"/>
77:    <arg value="${sampledata}/J062942"/>    
...
84:    <arg value="J062943"/>
85:    <arg value="${sampledata}/J062943"/>
...
92:    <arg value="J062944"/>
93:    <arg value="${sampledata}/J062944"/>
...
100:   <arg value="J0629445"/>
101:   <arg value="${sampledata}/J062941"/>
--

Let me post a bug fix and update the PC3 wiki files. Congrats on being the first to report a bug :D

Best,
--Yogesh


| -----Original Message-----
| From: Paolo Missier [mailto:pmissier at cs.man.ac.uk]
| Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:05 AM
| To: Yogesh Simmhan
| Subject: PC3: one detail
| 
| Yogesh,
| 
|  also in build.xml
| 
| you have:
|      <target name="runJ062942" description="run with J062942 data set">
|        <java classname="info.ipaw.pc3.PSLoadWorkflow.LoadWorkflow">
|          <arg value="J062942"/>
|          <arg value="${sampledata}/J062941"/>    <!--     IS THIS
| INTENTIONAL?  -->
|          <classpath refid="project.class.path" />
|         </java>
|    </target>
| 
| cheers, -Paolo
| 




More information about the Provenance-challenge-ipaw-info mailing list