[provenance-challenge] Re: PC3: one detail
Yogesh Simmhan
yoges at microsoft.com
Fri Mar 20 14:36:01 GMT 2009
Hi Paolo:
Nope, that's a bug! The job IDs should be the same in the input parameters. i.e.
PC3\Java\build:xml
76: <arg value="J062942"/>
77: <arg value="${sampledata}/J062942"/>
...
84: <arg value="J062943"/>
85: <arg value="${sampledata}/J062943"/>
...
92: <arg value="J062944"/>
93: <arg value="${sampledata}/J062944"/>
...
100: <arg value="J0629445"/>
101: <arg value="${sampledata}/J062941"/>
--
Let me post a bug fix and update the PC3 wiki files. Congrats on being the first to report a bug :D
Best,
--Yogesh
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Paolo Missier [mailto:pmissier at cs.man.ac.uk]
| Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:05 AM
| To: Yogesh Simmhan
| Subject: PC3: one detail
|
| Yogesh,
|
| also in build.xml
|
| you have:
| <target name="runJ062942" description="run with J062942 data set">
| <java classname="info.ipaw.pc3.PSLoadWorkflow.LoadWorkflow">
| <arg value="J062942"/>
| <arg value="${sampledata}/J062941"/> <!-- IS THIS
| INTENTIONAL? -->
| <classpath refid="project.class.path" />
| </java>
| </target>
|
| cheers, -Paolo
|
More information about the Provenance-challenge-ipaw-info
mailing list