<div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Hi all,</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<br></div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">We had a good discussion - in summary:</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<br></div><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">1) We're going to rework the recruitment mail a little, emphasising the history feature & the upcoming shared workspaces. We'll then send that off to another 10 archaeologists. We're also wondering if it'd be worthwhile sending a shorter email to the people in the last list (or maybe just the two who have registered) asking how they're getting on? The current email is at </span><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EWlzxQV7WcTY_mJ-CxK6j4SB79jYWW2PofT4npKkpiU/edit">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EWlzxQV7WcTY_mJ-CxK6j4SB79jYWW2PofT4npKkpiU/edit</a> (shout if you want to read it and don't yet have access)</font><div>
<div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br></div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
2) There's definitely an opportunity to use LP Archaeology/CR Archaeology (<a href="http://crarchaeology.co.uk/" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)">http://crarchaeology.co.uk/</a>), as well as another archaeology contact of Tom. Would it be of value to meet up with them in the New Year to get some feedback, and maybe ask them to deploy some of the phones at their sites? I feel it may be good to target some groups that are definitely going to be doing archaeology, and are keen to try out our system.<br clear="all">
<div><br></div><div>3) Plenary Presentation: We're thinking that we'd have a contextual intro from Graeme (5 minutes or so?), followed by 7 minutes from the two of us. I can see the structure of mine being:</div>
<div>
<br></div><div>0. Swift re-introduction to PoN</div><div>1. How we've been using PoN: Tidgrove deployment, deploying to commercial archaeologists, pushing to other archaeologists via public deployment. I'd like to highlight the case with the student & Linda (which has some audio, too).</div>
<div>2. What we've added: History view, mobile version (with screenshots). Emphasise how this uses the provenance-enabled backend to provide the history view.</div><div>3. What's next: Shared workspaces, internal deployment (with a wiki import) as an 'eating our own dog food' approach. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Given it's the same externals (I believe?), I imagine a "continuation" presentation may be more useful than going over the same details as last time - especially given the time available.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Luc: Am going to be working on the slides today, so can hopefully get a draft version to you tomorrow.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Mike</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Dr Michael O. Jewell<br>
ECS, University of Southampton<br>
</div>