[Patina] Re: Meeting Outcomes

[Michael Jewell]

That all sounds fine! So something like:

0. Re-introduction to PoN: Note-taking for archaeologists,
provenance-enabled interpretation capture.
1. Updates: History View, Mobile Version, Shared Workspaces (WIP)
2. Deployments: Clatford (technology trial - gave us a chance to try out
wifi, generator, server, etc - even if it was a literal wash-out), Tidgrove
(two phases - one for data entry, one for note-taking using mobile
version), LP Arch (in progress - deployment to commercial archaeologists),
open web deployment (in progress, slowly approaching more archaeologists).
3. What's next: Internal deployment (show example of wiki content),
deployment to other archaelogical teams (CR Arch, Vince? :).

(As an aside, does anyone know if there's a standard ECS powerpoint
template these days?)

(As another aside: once we have shared workspaces, I can see the internal
deployment, LP, etc, all working from a single deployment of PoN... to be
discussed later :)

Cheers,
Mike



> Few specific comments regarding the outline:
>
>  0. Swift re-introduction to PoN
> 1. How we've been using PoN: Tidgrove deployment, deploying to commercial
> archaeologists, pushing to other archaeologists via public deployment. I'd
> like to highlight the case with the student & Linda (which has some audio,
> too).
> 2. What we've added: History view, mobile version (with screenshots).
> Emphasise how this uses the provenance-enabled backend to provide the
> history view.
> 3. What's next: Shared workspaces, internal deployment (with a wiki
> import) as an 'eating our own dog food' approach.
>
>   What about swapping 1 & 2?
> In this way you talk about what was developed first and then talk about
> the deployments.
>


 I know it is not chronological, but I think it would be nice to say
> "development is the past, deployment is present and future"
>
>From that point of view, I would move "Shared workspaces" to point 1 (just
> say that's work in progress) and so the emphasis in "what's next" is about
> internal and external deployments.
>


Luc and I counted 4 deployment attempts:
> - clatford (failed?)
> - tidgrove
> - LP archaeology (Tom going up north with the mobile phone)
> - the open Web deployment (going very slowly)
>




> Luc had the great suggestion to try and convince Vince to help us with a
> deployment of PoN with his team -- so it could be good to keep that in mind
> for the presentation.
>
>
> Enrico
>
> --
> Dr Enrico Costanza
> Lecturer, Agents, Interaction, Complexity Group
> School of Electronics and Computer Science
> University of Southampton, UK, SO17 1BJ
> http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/echttp://d-touch.org
>
>


-- 
Dr Michael O. Jewell
ECS, University of Southampton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/patina/attachments/20121206/0ebc6b75/attachment.html