[Patina] Re: Meeting Outcomes

[Enrico Costanza]

Thank you Mike.

This all sounds good.


Few specific comments regarding the outline:
> 0. Swift re-introduction to PoN
> 1. How we've been using PoN: Tidgrove deployment, deploying to 
> commercial archaeologists, pushing to other archaeologists via public 
> deployment. I'd like to highlight the case with the student & Linda 
> (which has some audio, too).
> 2. What we've added: History view, mobile version (with screenshots). 
> Emphasise how this uses the provenance-enabled backend to provide the 
> history view.
> 3. What's next: Shared workspaces, internal deployment (with a wiki 
> import) as an 'eating our own dog food' approach.
>
What about swapping 1 & 2?
In this way you talk about what was developed first and then talk about 
the deployments.
I know it is not chronological, but I think it would be nice to say 
"development is the past, deployment is present and future"
 From that point of view, I would move "Shared workspaces" to point 1 
(just say that's work in progress) and so the emphasis in "what's next" 
is about internal and external deployments.

Luc and I counted 4 deployment attempts:
- clatford (failed?)
- tidgrove
- LP archaeology (Tom going up north with the mobile phone)
- the open Web deployment (going very slowly)

Luc had the great suggestion to try and convince Vince to help us with a 
deployment of PoN with his team -- so it could be good to keep that in 
mind for the presentation.


Enrico

-- 
Dr Enrico Costanza
Lecturer, Agents, Interaction, Complexity Group
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, UK, SO17 1BJ

http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ec
http://d-touch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/patina/attachments/20121206/5feb545f/attachment.html