<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I think that might only apply if you're migrating from FV1 to FV2, it has to unpack the old homedir somewhere.<div><br></div><div>FV1 used to use up loads of CPU and disk IO, the new one uses us loads of CPU, but only a little more IO.</div><div><br></div><div>- Steve</div><div><br><div><div>On 2011-08-15, at 15:37, Chris Andrews wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Well, that's me never turning it on, then. 70GB of files on a 128GB SSD.
</div><div><br></div><div>Not that I have anything overly sensitive, and anything even slightly sensitive is already encrypted.</div><div><br></div><div>Chris</div><p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Monday, 15 August 2011 at 13:18, Mischa Tuffield wrote:</p><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<span><div><div>Indeed, it does seem a lot better, and can be used with TimeMachine without the need to hack .plist files. <br><br>One note of caution, it will render your machine useless for a while and half, and you need to have as much free space on your hard-drive as you have files in your home dir. <br><br>Mischa<br>On 15 Aug 2011, at 13:09, Steve Harris wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>Yes, I use it. It's much better than FileVault 1, which was a huge resource hog, and messed with TimeMachine.<br><br>- Steve<br><br>On 2011-08-15, at 12:57, dr. m.c. schraefel wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>So is anyone using file vault 2 in lion?<br><br>How's it going? would you recommend it?<br><br>thank you<br><br><br>mc<br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div></span>
</div></blockquote><div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>