[OSX-Users] Re: file vault 2 - any takers?

Chris Andrews w at lfie.org
Mon Aug 15 15:37:41 BST 2011


 Well, that's me never turning it on, then. 70GB of files on a 128GB SSD. 

Not that I have anything overly sensitive, and anything even slightly sensitive is already encrypted.

Chris 

On Monday, 15 August 2011 at 13:18, Mischa Tuffield wrote:

> Indeed, it does seem a lot better, and can be used with TimeMachine without the need to hack .plist files. 
> 
> One note of caution, it will render your machine useless for a while and half, and you need to have as much free space on your hard-drive as you have files in your home dir. 
> 
> Mischa
> On 15 Aug 2011, at 13:09, Steve Harris wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I use it. It's much better than FileVault 1, which was a huge resource hog, and messed with TimeMachine.
> > 
> > - Steve
> > 
> > On 2011-08-15, at 12:57, dr. m.c. schraefel wrote:
> > 
> > > So is anyone using file vault 2 in lion?
> > > 
> > > How's it going? would you recommend it?
> > > 
> > > thank you
> > > 
> > > 
> > > mc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/osx-users/attachments/20110815/8420c030/attachment.html 


More information about the Osx-users mailing list