[OSX-Users] Re: file vault 2 - any takers?
Chris Andrews
w at lfie.org
Mon Aug 15 15:37:41 BST 2011
Well, that's me never turning it on, then. 70GB of files on a 128GB SSD.
Not that I have anything overly sensitive, and anything even slightly sensitive is already encrypted.
Chris
On Monday, 15 August 2011 at 13:18, Mischa Tuffield wrote:
> Indeed, it does seem a lot better, and can be used with TimeMachine without the need to hack .plist files.
>
> One note of caution, it will render your machine useless for a while and half, and you need to have as much free space on your hard-drive as you have files in your home dir.
>
> Mischa
> On 15 Aug 2011, at 13:09, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > Yes, I use it. It's much better than FileVault 1, which was a huge resource hog, and messed with TimeMachine.
> >
> > - Steve
> >
> > On 2011-08-15, at 12:57, dr. m.c. schraefel wrote:
> >
> > > So is anyone using file vault 2 in lion?
> > >
> > > How's it going? would you recommend it?
> > >
> > > thank you
> > >
> > >
> > > mc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/osx-users/attachments/20110815/8420c030/attachment.html
More information about the Osx-users
mailing list