[OSX-Users] Re: RAM for a macbook
Chris Andrews
wolfie at wolfie.me
Mon Aug 23 17:28:31 BST 2010
On 23/08/2010 16:33, Philip Boulain wrote:
> There's no reason a MacBook Pro shouldn't be a perfectly functional
> machine for average use eight years from now unless Apple get all
> planned obsolescence about OS upgrades (since the Mac software world
> seems to very agressively drop support for non-bleeding-edge OS
> versions) or you can't be seen dead without the latest fashionable case
> redesign. ;)
The current crop of Macs are probably going to have a much longer shelf
life than the ones from c2004-2007, which all had bad luck in terms of
processor architectures. 2004-2006 PPC machines got dumped by OS X 10.6,
and the 2006-2007 Core Duos are likely to be dumped by OS X 10.7 when it
comes out. All the Core 2 Duos and onwards are fully 64-bit and so the
machines dumped by OS X 10.8 are likely to be dumped by a very arbitrary
rule.
Apple has also really slowed down OS X release cycles recently, so it
may well be that something like my MBP, which was bought just before OS
X 10.6 came out, might happily see another 2 OS upgrades.
Chris
More information about the Osx-users
mailing list