[OSX-Users] Re: iPhone 3.0 ...

[Jules]

You would have to talk to Tim, I've never had anything to do with 
eduroam and know nothing about it at all, sorry.

On 19/06/2009 09:18, David Tarrant wrote:
> Sad really as we use eduroam to authenticate people over the SOWN 
> network, however there is currently an issue somewhere with the 
> peering between ECS and the eduroam network.
>
> We are contemplating the possibility of peering directly to the 
> eduroam network rather than via soton iSolutions, this is now further 
> enforced if iSolutions don't view eduroam as a supported service.
>
> Thoughts Jules?
>
> Dave T
>
> On 19 Jun 2009, at 07:23, Leslie Carr wrote:
>
>> Although my experience with eduroam on other campuses is that it is 
>> almost impossible to log in to it, either using my soton.ac.uk or 
>> ecs.soton.ac.uk passwords.
>> I have no idea how to find out if it is a problem at our end.
>> -- 
>> Les
>>
>> On 18 Jun 2009, at 20:33, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>>
>>> When I spoke to iSolutions about eduroam, they said there was not 
>>> much demand for it, as noone had registered, so it wasn't given a 
>>> supported status...
>>> Although they know you don't have to register...
>>> They seemed to think I was one of only two or three they knew about.
>>> So I suggested that they might like to find out how many people were 
>>> actually using it.
>>>
>>> On 18/06/2009 12:28, "Tim Chown" <tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:07:10PM +0100, JD Marsters wrote:
>>>> Tim Chown wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:38:50AM +0100, Chris Andrews wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a new feature in the Wi-Fi prefs that I haven't tried yet 
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> should be great for iPod touch users in the University: 
>>>>>> auto-login to
>>>>>> hotspots. I'll give it a go next time I'm on campus...
>>>>>>
>>>>> This is there already if you use eduroam and 802.1x.
>>>>>
>>>> I find campus eduroam really very patchy indeed, which is a shame: 
>>>> some
>>>> other institutions I've been to have really good coverage. I think I'm
>>>> right in saying this is being addressed, though?
>>>
>>> Yes, it is.   And if you have such experiences report them to 
>>> serviceline :)
>>>
>>> Though one person in iSolutions seems violently opposed to 802.1x due
>>> to it not (yet) being available to sufficent standard by default in all
>>> OSes, which I see as a little short-sighted.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Jules

-- 
sysjkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk