[OSX-Users] Re: At last!

[Steve Harris]

Without having to run fuser, yes, it's a worthwhile improvement.

- Steve

On 11 Aug 2009, at 11:04, Hugh Glaser wrote:

> I thought so.
> The point of my message was that it gave me the application name :-)
>
>
> On 11/08/2009 10:58, "Marcus Cobden" <mc08r at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I just meant that I've had the equivalent message on Leopard without
> the text blaming a particular application.
>
> Thinking about it I do remember a similarly frustrating message on
> windows too.
>
> On 11 Aug 2009, at 10:50, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>
>> "sans application explanation"? - I understand the language, but the
>> semantics eludes me.
>>
>>
>> On 11/08/2009 10:22, "Marcus Cobden" <mc08r at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> No, I've had that message (sans application explanation) when trying
>> to eject a network volume (Usually I have a terminal left open into
>> that volume).
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2009, at 10:16, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>>
>>> 'The disk "server" couldn't be ejected because "iTunes" is using  
>>> it.'
>>>
>>> Thank you snow leopard - I'm pretty sure that is the first time I
>>> have been
>>> told what is the offending application.
>>> Or am I thinking of windows?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>