[OSX-Users] Re: At last!

[Hugh Glaser]

I thought so.
The point of my message was that it gave me the application name :-)


On 11/08/2009 10:58, "Marcus Cobden" <mc08r at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

I just meant that I've had the equivalent message on Leopard without
the text blaming a particular application.

Thinking about it I do remember a similarly frustrating message on
windows too.

On 11 Aug 2009, at 10:50, Hugh Glaser wrote:

> "sans application explanation"? - I understand the language, but the
> semantics eludes me.
>
>
> On 11/08/2009 10:22, "Marcus Cobden" <mc08r at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> No, I've had that message (sans application explanation) when trying
> to eject a network volume (Usually I have a terminal left open into
> that volume).
>
> On 11 Aug 2009, at 10:16, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>
>> 'The disk "server" couldn't be ejected because "iTunes" is using it.'
>>
>> Thank you snow leopard - I'm pretty sure that is the first time I
>> have been
>> told what is the offending application.
>> Or am I thinking of windows?
>>
>>
>
>
>