<div dir="ltr"><div>I would direct readers to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clearance_Center" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clearance_Center</a> to get an overview if CCC, which is a for-profit company and has sued universities (and lost).<br></div><div>I would think that this new venture is a case of Openwashing of a business model that is directly opposed to GOAL and many of its readers.</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:38 PM Heather Morrison <<a href="mailto:Heather.Morrison@uottawa.ca" target="_blank">Heather.Morrison@uottawa.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Peter Murray-Rust raises the important point that the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC)'s basic model fits with perpetual copyright, the antithesis of open access.</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
However, I argue that the open access movement needs to engage with the issues that will or might be raised by this group. Following is a bit of background, concluding with a recommendation that copyright for scholarly works should be led by the research community
not industry groups, perhaps coordinated by bodies such as Canada's Tri-Council of national research funding agencies. </div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Many advocates of open access also advocate for the most liberal of open licenses. From my perspective, this is naive because some of the most liberal of open licenses, in particular immediate dedication to public domain and CC licenses granting downstream
commercial use rights (CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA) grant to anyone the right to sell the works. This is already happening as open access works are included in toll access packages such as Elsevier's Scopus.</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Creators are giving away their works using CC licenses thinking they are contributing to a commons. The problem with this is that lack of restrictions means, for example, that images in CC-BY licensed works can be included either in Wikimedia commons for free
sharing or to create a for-pay image databank. </div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
If OA venues are lost in future, the toll access versions may be the only ones available. As I noted recently, the attrition rate at SpringerOpen is 16%, with most ceased journals de-listed by both SpringerOpen and DOAJ and content available through Springer's
subscriptions site: </div>
<a href="https://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/2019/07/22/springer-open-ceased-now-hybrid-oa-identification-challenges/" id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344LPNoLP746915" target="_blank">https://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/2019/07/22/springer-open-ceased-now-hybrid-oa-identification-challenges/</a>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
The trend towards market concentration that was evident for subscription based publishers is beginning to be seen with open access publishers as well. Examples: Versita was bought by De Gruyter; Medknow was bought by Wolters Kluwer; Co-Action was bought by
Taylor & Francis; Libertas Academic was bought by Sage; BMC was bought by Springer; as we report regularly, many of the OA journals by commercial publishers have no APC due to partnerships with universities and societies, indicating that traditional publishers
are pursuing such partnerships on a global basis. Plus many commercial initiatives once thought of as OA friendly (Mendeley, SSRN, Bepress) have been bought by Elsevier.</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Both perpetual copyright and the most liberal forms of open licensing are problematic for scholarly works. Members of CCC, OASPA, and other industry groups (e.g. STM, ALPSP) are in a conflict of interest position when advocating for particular approaches to
copyright / licensing, that is, members stand to benefit or lose financially. </div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
It is problematic for any of these groups to lead research and decision-making on matters of copyright. Leadership should come from the research community. Researchers need time to devote to such activity and in particular to coordinate. In Canada, coordination
of consultation on this topic might best be led by Canada's Tri-Council of national research funders, perhaps in cooperation with similar groups in other countries. </div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344Signature">
<div></div>
<div id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">Dr. <span style="font-size:12pt">Heather Morrison</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">Associate Professor, School of Information Studies, University of Ottawa</p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">Professeur Agrégé, École des Sciences de l'Information, Université d'Ottawa<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"></p>
<span id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344ms-rterangepaste-start"></span>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
Principal Investigator, Sustaining the Knowledge Commons, a SSHRC Insight Project</p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<a href="http://sustainingknowledgecommons.org" target="_blank">sustainingknowledgecommons.org</a></p>
<span id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344ms-rterangepaste-end"></span>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><a href="mailto:Heather.Morrison@uottawa.ca" target="_blank">Heather.Morrison@uottawa.ca</a><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><a href="https://uniweb.uottawa.ca/?lang=en#/members/706" class="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344OWAAutoLink" target="_blank">https://uniweb.uottawa.ca/?lang=en#/members/706</a></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">[On research sabbatical July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020]</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div id="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:goal-bounces@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal-bounces@eprints.org</a> <<a href="mailto:goal-bounces@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal-bounces@eprints.org</a>> on behalf of Peter Murray-Rust <<a href="mailto:pm286@cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">pm286@cam.ac.uk</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 11, 2019 7:32 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) <<a href="mailto:goal@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal@eprints.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GOAL] Call for applications - International Open Access Advisory Group</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size:9pt;font-family:"calibri";color:rgb(255,66,51)"><b>Attention : courriel externe | external email</b></div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div>What is the relation of this group to the actual activities of CCC? Does it have the power to advise that it extends copyright and licensing to areas what those practices do great harm, and that the prices for re-use are often extortionate (one article
in NEJM apparently generated over 1 million USD for re-use of a scholarly article).<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>If the advisory group were to recommend that CCC's activities be transparently regulated with price caps I might have some sympathy. As it is CCC will have to convince me that it is more than an unregulated rent-seeker.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>(It's also the antithesis of Open Access - the theme of this list)<br clear="all">
</div>
<div><br>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail-m_-2068897525476010344x_gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>"I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Peter Murray-Rust<br>
Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics<br>
Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry<br>
University of Cambridge<br>
CB2 1EW, UK<br>
+44-1223-763069</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
GOAL mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GOAL@eprints.org" target="_blank">GOAL@eprints.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail-m_-7854280800814098780gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>"I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".<br></div><div><br></div><div>Peter Murray-Rust<br>Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics<br>Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry<br>University of Cambridge<br>CB2 1EW, UK<br>+44-1223-763069</div></div></div></div></div>