<html><head></head><body>Interesting, especially nostalgic. However, a good start re Elsevier became the story of Maxwell. Pity<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On June 27, 2017 8:22:08 AM GMT+01:00, "Éric Archambault" <eric.archambault@science-metrix.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Interesting article in the Guardian that spells out the role played by Robert Maxwell in the development of the scholarly journal industry. <br /><br />Éric<br /><br /><br />Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?<br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other">https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other</a><br /><br /><br />Eric Archambault<br /><a href="http://1science.com">1science.com</a><br /><a href="http://Science-Metrix.com">Science-Metrix.com</a><br />+1-514-495-6505 x111<br /><br /><hr /><br />GOAL mailing list<br />GOAL@eprints.org<br /><a href="http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal">http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>