<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Heather Morrison <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Heather.Morrison@uottawa.ca" target="_blank">Heather.Morrison@uottawa.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>Another point: we agree that facts are not copyrightable. Assuming we are correct in this assumption, there is no argument for limiting this work to material licensed CC-BY. This kind of work could be carried out with material under any kind of license
including all rights reserved. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The research involves **copying** the material (often > 100,000 separate items) to several sites including public repositories and Wikimedia computers. This is only possible in practice with an explicit permissive licence such as CC BY. It would be a potential breach of copyright to use material where explicit permission was not given on the document or metadata intimately semantically associated with it.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br><div>
<div><br>
</div><br></div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Peter Murray-Rust<br>Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics<br>Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry<br>University of Cambridge<br>CB2 1EW, UK<br>+44-1223-763069</div></div></div>
</div></div>