<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.gmail-hoenzb
{mso-style-name:gmail-hoenzb;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Forwarding from SPARC-OAForum. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Rick Anderson [mailto:rick.anderson@utah.edu] <br><b>Sent:</b> 23 January 2017 16:03<br><b>To:</b> richard.poynder@btinternet.com; SPARC-OAForum@arl.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [sparc-oaforum] Fwd: [SCHOLCOMM] How much of the content in open repositories is able to meet the definition of open access?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>For what it’s worth, Richard and I seem to have been thinking along similar lines recently. My posting in the Scholarly Kitchen today is about competing definitions of OA; part 2, tomorrow, will be about competing visions for the future of scholarly communication among various members of the OA community:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/01/23/diversity-open-access-movement-part-1-differing-definitions/">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/01/23/diversity-open-access-movement-part-1-differing-definitions/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>---<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Rick Anderson<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Assoc. Dean for Collections & Scholarly Communication<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Marriott Library, University of Utah<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Desk: (801) 587-9989<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Cell: (801) 721-1687<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><a href="mailto:rick.anderson@utah.edu">rick.anderson@utah.edu</a></span><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #B5C4DF 4.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:18.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=EN-US>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b>Richard Poynder</b> <<a href="mailto:richard.poynder@btinternet.com">richard.poynder@btinternet.com</a>><br>Date: 23 January 2017 at 11:19<br>Subject: [SCHOLCOMM] How much of the content in open repositories is able to meet the definition of open access?<br>To: <a href="mailto:scholcomm@lists.ala.org">scholcomm@lists.ala.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>OA advocates maintain that the formative definition of open access agreed at the meeting that led to the Budapest Open Access Initiative means that only papers with a CC BY licence attached can be described as open access. And yet millions of papers in open repositories are not available with a CC BY licence.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Take, for instance, PubMed Central, which currently has 4.2 million documents deposited in it. A recent search shows that only 24% of the non-historical documents in PMC have a CC BY licence, and so 76% of the content cannot be described as open access.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>The good news is that the CC BY percentage in PMC is growing over time. Nevertheless, that it has still only reached 24% a decade after the NIH Public Access policy came into effect suggests that the OA movement still has a way to go if it is to live up to the BOAI definition. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>More here: <a href="http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/the-nih-public-access-policy-triumph-of.html" target="_blank">http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/the-nih-public-access-policy-triumph-of.html</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#888888'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#888888'>Richard Poynder<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><br><br clear=all><o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>-- <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Richard Poynder<br><a href="http://www.richardpoynder.co.uk" target="_blank">www.richardpoynder.co.uk</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>-- <br>-- <br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google<br>Groups "SPARC OA Forum" group.<br>To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:sparc-oaforum@arl.org">sparc-oaforum@arl.org</a><br>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to<br><a href="mailto:sparc-oaforum+unsubscribe@arl.org">sparc-oaforum+unsubscribe@arl.org</a><br>For more options, visit this group at<br><a href="http://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/group/sparc-oaforum">http://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/group/sparc-oaforum</a><br><br>--- <br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC OA Forum" group.<br>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:sparc-oaforum+unsubscribe@arl.org">sparc-oaforum+unsubscribe@arl.org</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></blockquote></div></body></html>