<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dana Roth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dzrlib@library.caltech.edu" target="_blank">dzrlib@library.caltech.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Speaking of ‘Gold’ Open Access:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I have long wondered</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> why libraries
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">should contribute</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">to the</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> publication costs that arise from
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">SCOAP3’s
</span><u><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">GOLD</span></u><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> open access</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
… especially since h</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">igh energy physic</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">ists</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">
ha</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">ve</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> a
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">very
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">long history of freely providing access to their work, historically through paper preprints and currently though the online arXiv preprint server.
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Th</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">e</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">
subsequent</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">,</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">and seemingly redundant,
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">publication of
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">‘Gold Open Access’</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> articles then becomes,
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">what appears to be, an</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> expensive affectation …
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">especially
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">since arXiv is THE working platform for high energy physics research.</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You're right about that, I think: <a href="http://j.mp/noscoap">http://j.mp/noscoap</a></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">The concept of SCOAP3 seems especially</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> ironic
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">in that
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">libraries have paid</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">,</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">
over the years, </span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">a small</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> fortune to commercial journal publishers
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">…
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">largely because of
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">some HEP authors’ desire to</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> avoid the
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">very reasonable
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">page charges formerly requested by </span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">society-published journals. </span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This might have some truth in HEP but it is by no means the explanation of the serials crisis in general (nor in physics nor even in HEP).</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div>
<p><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span style="color:black;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Some additional thoughts ... from colleagues that are familiar with the HEP community:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">1. "The arXiv eprint is considered as the primary means of scientific communication. Some senior scientists don't even seem to publish their papers in journals
anymore, they just leave them as arXiv eprints." </span></p></div></div></blockquote><div>So many HEP people have been saying that for years now, but no data on how true it is. My guess is that it's still very rare (for good reason):</div><div><br></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px">Harnad, S. (1998/2000/2004) </span><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px"><span class="" style="color:rgb(24,65,170)">The invisible hand of peer review</span></a><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px">. </span><i style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px">Nature</i><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px"> [online] (5 Nov. 1998), </span><a href="http://www.exploit-lib.org/issue5/peer-review/" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px"><span class="" style="color:rgb(24,65,170)"><i>Exploit Interactive</i></span></a><i style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px"> </i><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px">5 (2000): and in Shatz, B. (2004) (ed.) </span><i style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px">Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry</i><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px">. Rowland & Littlefield. Pp. 235-242. </span><a href="http://cogprints.org/1646/" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14px"><span class="" style="color:rgb(24,65,170)">http://cogprints.org/1646/</span></a><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">For e</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">xample,</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">14 of the 18 papers</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">,
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">in arXiv authored by Edward Witten dated 2010 thru 2013</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">,</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">
have not appeared as journal articles </span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">…
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">according to
<i>Inspire</i></span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">: </span><a href="https://inspirehep.net/?ln=en" target="_blank" style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">https://inspirehep.net/?ln=en</a></p></div></div></blockquote><div>Ed Witten is definitely not a representative case. A peerless genius, and known to be such: if the field were all Ed Wittens it might be true that peer review was unnecessary... </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div>
<p><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> </span><span style="color:black;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">2. “Sometimes publishers replace citations to eprints with citations to the published version of the paper, for completeness, but scientists see them as interchangeable.
Often-times </span><span style="color:black;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">the final version posted to arXiv is the published version (at least as far as content goes)."</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div>The accepted, peer-reviewed postprint is posted in Arxiv (unless there has been no change in the unrefereed preprint). There is indeed no need for the publisher's version of record, except for the canonical citation. But that does not mean the peer review was not needed.</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p><span style="color:black;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">3. "I've seen enough Physics and Astrophysics seminars to know that faculty provide links in their powerpoints to arXiv URLs and not to the peer reviewed journal
article."</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The URL is for the access version. The citation is for the record.</div><div><br></div><div>[Once the final peer-reviewed, accepted version is being self-archived in every author's institutional repository (because it has been mandated by their institutions and funders) there will no longer be any need for the publisher's version: the self-archived version will become the version of record. However, the tag indicating which journal's peer-review standards were met, when, will continue to be the journal reference.]</div><div><br></div><div>Stevan Harnad</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> </span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Dana L. Roth</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Caltech Library 1-32</span><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125</span><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="tel:626-395-6423" value="+16263956423" target="_blank">626-395-6423</a> fax <a href="tel:626-792-7540" value="+16267927540" target="_blank">626-792-7540</a></span><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="mailto:dzrlib@library.caltech.edu" target="_blank">dzrlib@library.caltech.edu</a></span><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="http://library.caltech.edu/collections/chemistry.htm" target="_blank">http://library.caltech.edu/collections/chemistry.htm</a></span><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"> <a href="mailto:goal-bounces@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal-bounces@eprints.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:goal-bounces@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal-bounces@eprints.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Stevan Harnad<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 24, 2014 6:35 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [GOAL] Re: Any examples of journals charging non refundable fee for peer review?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Before Mandatory Green Open Access becomes universal, all Gold OA fees are overpriced, double-paid, unsustainable <a href="http://j.mp/foolsgoldOA" target="_blank">Fool's Gold</a> fees, whether they are for publication of for refereeing. <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">After Mandatory Green Open Access becomes universal, everything changes, and No-Fault refereeing fees become Fair-Gold, affordable and sustainable:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left:30pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Harnad, Stevan (2010) <a href="http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july10/harnad/07harnad.html" target="_blank">No-Fault Peer Review Charges: The Price of Selectivity Need Not Be Access Denied
or Delayed</a>. <em><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">D-Lib Magazine</span></em>, 16, (7/8)</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-left:30pt;margin-right:0in">
<blockquote style="margin-left:30pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<h3 style="line-height:13.5pt"><font><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',sans-serif;color:rgb(43,83,142)">Abstract </span><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',sans-serif;color:rgb(43,83,142);font-weight:normal">Plans by universities and research funders
to pay the costs of Open Access Publishing ("Gold OA") are premature. Funds are short; 80% of journals (including virtually all the top journals) are still subscription-based, tying up the potential funds to pay for Gold OA; the asking price for Gold OA is
still high; and there is concern that paying to publish may inflate acceptance rates and lower quality standards. What is needed now is for universities and funders to mandate OA self-archiving (of authors' final peer-reviewed drafts, immediately upon acceptance
for publication) ("Green OA"). That will provide immediate OA; and</span><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',sans-serif;color:rgb(43,83,142)"> if and when universal Green OA should go on to make subscriptions unsustainable (because users are
satisfied with just the Green OA versions) that will in turn induce journals to cut costs (print edition, online edition, access-provision, archiving), downsize to just providing the service of peer review, and convert to the Gold OA cost-recovery model; meanwhile,
the subscription cancellations will have released the funds to pay these residual service costs.
<i>The natural way to charge for the service of peer review then will be on a "no-fault basis," with the author's institution or funder paying for each round of refereeing, regardless of outcome (acceptance, revision/re-refereeing, or rejection).
</i></span><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',sans-serif;color:rgb(43,83,142);font-weight:normal">This will minimize cost while protecting against inflated acceptance rates and decline in quality standards.</span><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',sans-serif;color:rgb(43,83,142)"><u></u><u></u></span></font></h3>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Frantsvåg Jan Erik <<a href="mailto:jan.e.frantsvag@uit.no" target="_blank">jan.e.frantsvag@uit.no</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I assume what you are referring to, is what is often called submission fees.</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">This is treated in this report</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Files/Filer/downloads/Open%20Access/KE_Submission_fees_Short_Report_2010-11-25.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Files/Filer/downloads/Open%20Access/KE_Submission_fees_Short_Report_2010-11-25.pdf</a>
</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Both OA and TA journals use this, some OA journals are listed in a table in the report.</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Best,</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Jan Erik</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Jan Erik Frantsvåg</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Open Access adviser</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">The University Library</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">UiT The Arctic University of Norway</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">phone
<a href="tel:%2B47%2077%2064%2049%2050" target="_blank">+47 77 64 49 50</a></span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">e-mail
</span><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="mailto:jan.e.frantsvag@uit.no" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-GB">jan.e.frantsvag@uit.no</span></a></span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="http://en.uit.no/ansatte/organisasjon/ansatte/person?p_document_id=43618&p_dimension_id=88187" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-GB">http://en.uit.no/ansatte/organisasjon/ansatte/person?p_document_id=43618&p_dimension_id=88187</span></a>
</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Publications:
</span><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6rycjns" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-GB">http://tinyurl.com/6rycjns</span></a>
</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><a href="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-8799" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-GB">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-8799</span></a>
</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN" style="font-family:'Gill Sans W02',serif;color:rgb(147,149,152)"><a href="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-8799" title="" target="_blank"><b><span style="color:white">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-8799</span></b></a></span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223);border-top-width:1pt;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">Fra:</span></b><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">
<a href="mailto:goal-bounces@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal-bounces@eprints.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:goal-bounces@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal-bounces@eprints.org</a>]
<b>På vegne av</b> Danny Kingsley<br>
<b>Sendt:</b> 24. oktober 2014 02:08<br>
<b>Til:</b> <a href="mailto:goal@eprints.org" target="_blank">goal@eprints.org</a><br>
<b>Emne:</b> [GOAL] Any examples of journals charging non refundable fee for peer review?</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Hi all,</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I am passing on a question from a library in Australia:</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">"I have recently become aware that some publishers and journals are charging authors a non-refundable fee to have their
articles peer reviewed that is separate from the article processing charge. I hadn’t heard about this until one of our librarians mentioned it in passing.</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">I was wondering if anyone else had come across this (or whether I’ve just had my head in the sand and not noticed!), and
if so, whether it is common. Any examples would be great </span><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Wingdings;color:black">J</span><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">“ </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">Dr Danny Kingsley</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">Visting Fellow</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science (CPAS)</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">p:
<a href="tel:%2B61%20413%20101%20197" target="_blank">+61 413 101 197</a></span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">w: <a href="http://cpas.anu.edu.au/about-us/people/danny-kingsley" target="_blank">http://cpas.anu.edu.au/about-us/people/danny-kingsley</a></span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="color:black">t: @openaccess_oz</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
GOAL mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GOAL@eprints.org" target="_blank">GOAL@eprints.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal" target="_blank">http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
GOAL mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GOAL@eprints.org">GOAL@eprints.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal" target="_blank">http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>