<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><div>On May 28, 2014, at 6:33 AM, David Wojick <<a href="mailto:dwojick@CRAIGELLACHIE.US">dwojick@CRAIGELLACHIE.US</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">I have been getting serious about open access. Specifically I have started a weekly</blockquote><blockquote type="cite">subscription newsletter called "Inside Public Access" (see <a href="http://insidepublicaccess.com/">http://insidepublicaccess.com/</a>).</blockquote><blockquote type="cite">We are tracking the emerging US Public Access program, which should be a major influence</blockquote><blockquote type="cite">on worldwide open access policies. In any case it is a massive and complex program in</blockquote><blockquote type="cite">it's own right. Our rates are quite reasonable as these things go. We just published our eighth</blockquote><blockquote type="cite">weekly issue and our backlist is included with new subscriptions. Individual issues are also available.</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br></div><div>Interesting times,</div><div>David Wojick, Ph.D.</div><div>Inside Public Access</div><a href="http://insidepublicaccess.com/">http://insidepublicaccess.com/</a></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Wow, is that ever the opposite of what I said, and meant, which was about getting serious, </div><div>not getting rich! </div><div><br></div><div>$500 per year or $20 per issue to read what <a href="http://insidepublicaccess.com/issues.html">one</a> <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/">individual</a> has to say about open access...</div><div><br></div><div>Let’s hope that the emerging US Public Access program will be “tracked” — and its policy shaped — by </div><div>knowledgeable representatives of the research community, motivated to facilitate and accelerate OA growth, </div><div>rather than by “<a href="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?serendipity%5Baction%5D=search&serendipity%5BsearchTerm%5D=wojick&serendipity%5BsearchButton%5D=%3E">policy consultants</a>” motivated to constrain and retard it.</div><div><br></div><div>Caveat Emptor</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>On May 28, 2014, at 1:40 AM, Stevan Harnad <<a href="mailto:amsciforum@GMAIL.COM">amsciforum@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:</div><div><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1113-.html"><b>Video interview of Stevan Harnad</b></a> by Maciej Chojnowski (CeON) prior to Invited</blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Keynote on "How to Formulate Effective Policies to Open Access to Research</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Worldwide". Conference on <i><a href="https://conference2014.ceon.pl/conference/program/">Opening Science to Meet Future Challenges</a></i>. Centre</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">for Open Science, part of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw, 11 March 2014<br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><br></div></blockquote></div></div></div></body></html>