<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-2022-JP"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.04.13 16:15, schrieb Heather
Morrison:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:35E397FA-BD50-4FC1-96FD-A6B7005180FD@sfu.ca"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">One reason is that it is common ... for students to go on to
revise and submit either portions of a thesis or the entire thesis for
re-publication as articles or books. ... For
this reason, it will generally be in the best interest of the student
<i><b>to reserve the right to create derivatives and commercial use.</b></i></pre>
</blockquote>
which of course they have and do not need to expressly "reserve"
when <br>
they issue their work under CC-BY.<br>
<br>
It is another discussion whether they need the *exclusive* rights to
do so. <br>
<br>
a) Their and others' academic ability to cut and paste (or whichever
<br>
way to create derivatives) or earn reputation from derivatives made
by <br>
others, is governed more by good research/academic practises than <br>
by *any* license.<br>
<br>
b) whether they need to *sign over exclusive* commercial rights (or<br>
to create derivative) is an issue still under discussion, pending
real evidence. <br>
Even if their preferred publisher pretends he needs these exclusive
rights,<br>
your poor (humanities ?) scholar would give away once and for all
those <br>
very rights you say (s)he needs.<br>
<br>
best,<br>
<br>
Hans<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>