<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>Stevan summarises the current situation on UK OA policy very well. It is
surprising after almost six months of criticism of the Finch Report that there
has been so little defence of the Finch/RCUK/BIS position and (to my knowledge)
no response to the criticism voiced. Of all the parties involved, RCUK have been
the most communicative in defending their policy, although largely repeating the
Finch Group’s position. I have only seen one e-mail from one member of the Finch
Group (Martin Hall of Salford University) explaining his personal position.
There has been no response at all from HM Government, although BIS civil
servants must be monitoring the blogs and lists and the articles by Paul Jump in
“Times Higher Education”. I myself have addressed three e-mails to Rt Hon David
Willetts MP through a message system on the BIS web-site for those taxpayers who
“want to get in touch with a BIS Minister”, receiving no reply to any of the
three messages within the 15 working days promised. He is a busy man, no doubt,
but the failure of BIS civil servants to send even an acknowledgement
illustrates the determination of UK Government to ignore any criticism.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Equally surprising is the lack of any dialogue with journal publishers. Are
not those smaller OA publishers who must have been hoping that the UK Government
policy would give them a bigger share of public expenditure on academic journals
not wondering whether the goldmine is a mirage? We rarely hear anything to do
with business models from the big international STM publishers. Are they feeling
secure in the knowledge that libraries will continue to pay high prices for big
licensing deals even if insufficient money is available to pay for all APCs?
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>One of the benefits from OA to research publication is that OA enables a
broader dialogue on the outcomes from academic research than is possible in a
toll-access publication system, enabling other researchers to comment on
published research and taxpayers to see the results from the research they have
funded. It is sad that no such dialogue appears to be allowed on the policy to
implement OA in the UK.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Fred Friend</DIV>
<DIV>Honorary Director Scholarly Communication UCL</DIV>
<DIV><A
href="http://www.friendofopenaccess.org.uk">http://www.friendofopenaccess.org.uk</A>
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=amsciforum@gmail.com
href="mailto:amsciforum@gmail.com">Stevan Harnad</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:17 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=goal@eprints.org href="mailto:goal@eprints.org">Global
Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Cc:</B> <A title=LIBLICENSE-L@listserv.crl.edu
href="mailto:LIBLICENSE-L@listserv.crl.edu">LibLicense-L Discussion Forum</A> ;
<A title=serialst@list.uvm.edu href="mailto:serialst@list.uvm.edu">Lib Serials
list</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> [GOAL] The UK Gold Rush: "A Hand-Out from the British
Government"</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><STRONG>Re:
</STRONG>"<A style="COLOR: rgb(0,51,102)"
href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=422015&c=1">Finch
access plan unlikely to fly across the Atlantic</A>" <BR>(<EM>Times Higher
Education</EM>, 6 December 2012)</BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">It's
not just the US and the Social Sciences that will not join the UK's Gold Rush.
Neither will Europe, nor Australia, nor the developing world. </SPAN><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">The
reason is simple: The Finch/RCUK/BIS policy was not thought through. It was
hastily and carelessly cobbled together without proper representation from the
most important stake-holders: researchers and their institutions, the providers
of the research to which access is to be opened. </SPAN><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">Instead,
Finch/RCUK/BIS heeded the lobbying from the UK's sizeable research publishing
industry, including both subscription publishers and Gold OA publishers, as well
as from a private biomedical research funder that was rather too sure of its own
OA strategy (even though that strategy has not so far been very successful). BIS
was also rather simplistic about the "industrial applications" potential of its
6% of world research output, not realizing that unilateral OA from one country
is of limited usefulness, and a globally scaleable OA policy requires some
global thinking and consultation.</SPAN><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">Now
it will indeed amount to "</SPAN><A
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(0,51,102); FONT-SIZE: 13px"
href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=422015&c=1">a
handout from the British government</A><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">"
-- a lot of money in exchange for very little OA -- unless (as I still fervently
hope) RCUK has the wisdom and character to fix its OA mandate as it has by now
been repeatedly urged from all sides to do, instead of just digging in to a
doomed policy: </SPAN><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px"><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">Adopt
an </SPAN><A
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(0,51,102); FONT-SIZE: 13px"
href="http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/342647/1/Oxtalk.pdf">effective
mechanism</A><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 13px">
to ensure compliance with the mandate to self-archive in UK institutional
repositories (Green OA), in collaboration with UK institutions. And scale down
the Gold OA to just the affordable minimum for which there is a genuine demand,
instead of trying to force it down the throats of all UK researchers in place of
cost-free self-archiving: The UK institutional repositories are already there:
ready, waiting -- and empty.</SPAN>
<P>
<HR>
_______________________________________________<BR>GOAL mailing
list<BR>GOAL@eprints.org<BR>http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal<BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>