[GOAL] Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?

[barry.mahon at iol.ie]

Interesting, especially nostalgic. However, a good start re Elsevier became the story of Maxwell. Pity

On June 27, 2017 8:22:08 AM GMT+01:00, "Éric Archambault" <eric.archambault at science-metrix.com> wrote:
>Interesting article in the Guardian that spells out the role played by
>Robert Maxwell in the development of the scholarly journal industry. 
>
>Éric
>
>
>Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad
>for science?
>https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
>
>
>Eric Archambault
>1science.com
>Science-Metrix.com
>+1-514-495-6505 x111
>
>_______________________________________________
>GOAL mailing list
>GOAL at eprints.org
>http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20170627/940df434/attachment.html