[GOAL] [SCHOLCOMM] Help requested in identifying articles on OA Policies and IRs

Charlotte Roh croh2 at usfca.edu
Wed Oct 5 17:55:33 BST 2016


Hi Andree,

I can't wait to see this article, it sounds like a great project.

This is not an article, but a report, from the UC system:
http://www.ucop.edu/information-technology-services/initiatives/sautter-award-program/sautter-2016/UCOP-UC-Publication-Management-System.pdf

Best,
Charlotte

--------------------------------------------------------
Charlotte Roh
Scholarly Communications Librarian
University of San Francisco
Gleeson Library | Geschke Center
croh2 at usfca.edu
(415)422-4745

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Stevan Harnad <amsciforum at gmail.com> wrote:

> A few references you missed, Andree:
>
> Swan, A; Gargouri, Y; Hunt, M; & Harnad, S (2015) Open Access Policy:
> Numbers, Analysis, Effectiveness. Pasteur4OA Workpackage 3 Report.
> http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/375854/
>
> Harnad, S (2015) Open Access: What, Where, When, How and Why. In: Ethics,
> Science, Technology, and Engineering: An International Resource eds. J.
> Britt Holbrook & Carl Mitcham, (2nd edition of Encyclopedia of Science,
> Technology, and Ethics, Farmington Hills MI: MacMillan Reference)
> http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/361704/
>
> Harnad, S (2015) Optimizing Open Access Policy. The Serials Librarian,
> 69(2), 133-141 http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/381526/
> <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/381526/>
>
> Vincent-Lamarre, P, Boivin, J, Gargouri, Y, Larivière, V & Harnad,  (2016) Estimating
> Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score.
> <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/370203/>Journal of the  Association for
> Information Science and Technology (JASIST)  67 (in press)
> http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/370203/
>
> SH
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Danny Kingsley <dak45 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While I have issues with what is happening with the UK OA policies (I
>> very much disagree with the amount we are spending on hybrid), there is no
>> doubt they work. At Cambridge University we have received our 10,000th
>> submission  - that’s a unique article that is eligible to be claimed for
>> the next Research Excellence Framework - into Apollo, the Cambridge
>> repository. This is since we started our OA service on 1 April 2013 in
>> response to the RCUK policy.
>>
>> https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=949
>>
>> We are receiving 50% of all of the research outputs produced by the
>> University as a result of these funder policies.
>>
>> Researchers will not do it on their own. Institutions and funders need to
>> decide if they want research to be available open access and if they do
>> they need to both mandate it and also provide support within institutions
>> to manage the processing.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Danny
>>
>>
>> Dr Danny Kingsley
>> Head, Office of Scholarly Communication
>> Cambridge University Library
>> West Road, Cambridge CB39DR
>> P: +44 (0) 1223 747 437
>> M: +44 (0) 7711 500 564
>> E: dak45 at cam.ac.uk
>> T: @dannykay68
>> B: https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/
>> S: http://www.slideshare.net/DannyKingsley
>> ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3636-5939
>>
>>
>> On 4 Oct 2016, at 21:26, Andree Rathemacher <andree at uri.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hi scholcomm folks,
>>
>> Julia Lovett and I are working on an article, based on a survey of
>> University of Rhode Island faculty, on faculty attitudes about compliance
>> with our permissions-based OA policy.
>>
>> As Christine Fruin and Shan Sutton noted in their recent C&RL article
>> <http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.4.469>, there is not a whole lot out
>> there on North American institutional OA policies. I've done LISTA, Scopus,
>> and Web of Science searches, but I'm wondering if I've missed any reports,
>> chapters, or other perhaps less-traditional outputs that have anything to
>> do with *faculty author attitudes towards and compliance* *with OA
>> policies*. I'll paste my current bibliography below so you can see what
>> I have.
>>
>> Also, in the article, we would like to briefly make the point that
>> librarians have long struggled with filling their IRs. There are many, many
>> articles out there looking at specific cases, but I was hoping for a *literature
>> review or recent comprehensive article*, if anyone knows of one. Of
>> course there is the recent Van de Velde blog post
>> <http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html> and Poynder
>> interview with Lynch
>> <http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/q-with-cnis-clifford-lynch-time-to-re_22.html>
>> .
>>
>> Thanks so much for any help you can provide.
>>
>> List is below. Please excuse cross-posting to the COAPI list.
>>
>> Best,
>> Andrée
>>
>> OPEN ACCESS POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
>>
>> Anderson, R. (2016). Why are there virtually no mandatory open access
>> policies at American universities? Learned Publishing 29(3), 215-218.
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1034
>>
>> Armbruster, C. (2011). Open access policy implementation: First results
>> compared. Learned Publishing 24(4), 311-324.
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110409
>>
>> Awre, C., Beeken, A., Jones, B., Stainthorp, P., & Stone, G. (2016).
>> Communicating the open access policy landscape. Insights 29(2), 126-132.
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.308
>>
>> Duranceau, E. F., & Kriegsman, S. (2016). Campus open access policy
>> implementation models and implications for IR services. In B. B. Callicott,
>> D. Scherer, & A. Wesolkek (Eds.), Making Institutional Repositories Work
>> (pp. 87-106). Charleston insights in library, archival, and information
>> sciences. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
>>
>> Duranceau, E. F., & Kriegsman, S. (2013). Implementing open access
>> policies using institutional repositories. In P. Bluh, C. Hepfer, & M. L.
>> Ramírez (Eds.), The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges (pp.
>> 81-105). ALCTS papers on library technical services and collections 18.
>> Chicago: Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, American
>> Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites
>> /ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/papers/ir_ch05_.pdf
>>
>> Emmett, A., & Peterson, T. (2010). Achieving consensus on the University
>> of Kansas open-access policy. Research Library Issues 269, 5-7.
>>
>> Emmett, A., Stratton, J., Peterson, A. T., Church-Duran, J., & Haricombe,
>> L. (2011). Toward open access: It takes a village. Journal of Library
>> Administration 51(5/6), 557-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0193
>> 0826.2011.589345
>>
>> Fruin, C., & Sutton, S. (2016). Strategies for success: Open access
>> policies at North American educational institutions. College & Research
>> Libraries 77(4), 469-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.4.469
>>
>> Gilbert, J., Kinger, M., & Kullman, L. (2011). Implementing an open
>> access policy at Chalmers Institute of Technology. IATUL Annual
>> Conference Proceedings 21, 1-9.
>>
>> Kern, B., & Wishnetsky, S. (2014). Adopting and implementing an open
>> access policy: The library’s role. Serials Librarian 66(1-4), 196-203.
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2014.880035
>>
>> Kipphut-Smith, S. (2014). Engaging in a campus-wide conversation about
>> open access. Texas Library Journal 90(2), 70-71.
>>
>> Kipphut-Smith, S. (2014). “Good enough”: Developing a simple workflow for
>> open access policy implementation. College & Undergraduate Libraries 21(3/4),
>> 279-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2014.932263
>>
>> Ludwig, D. (2010). Open access at the University of Kansas. College &
>> Research Libraries News 71(7), 360-363, 384.
>>
>> McGuigan, G. S. (2015). The NIH Public Access Policy and federally funded
>> research: An analysis of problem recognition and agenda setting. Journal
>> of Academic Librarianship 41(1), 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ac
>> alib.2014.09.014
>>
>> Miller, J. (2011). Open access and liberal arts colleges: Looking beyond
>> research institutions. College & Research Libraries News 72(1), 16-30.
>>
>> Shieber, S. (2009, June 30). University open-access policies as mandates
>> [Blog post]. Retrieved from  https://blogs.harvard.edu/pam
>> phlet/2009/06/30/university-open-access-policies-as-mandates/
>>
>> Smith, K. (2012). Why open access? The policy environment and process on
>> one university campus. Insights 25(3), 246-250.
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.3.246
>>
>> Taylor, A. (2013). Technical services report: Opening access for a new
>> era of scholarly publishing. A report of the ALCTS Continuing Resources
>> Section, Access to Continuing Resources Interest Group program, American
>> Library Association Annual conference, Anaheim, June 2012. Technical
>> Services Quarterly 30(2), 217-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0731
>> 7131.2013.759833
>>
>> Vandegrift, M., & Colvin, G. (2012). Relational communications. College
>> & Research Libraries News 73(7), 386-389.
>>
>> Van Noorden, R. (2014). Funders punish open-access dodgers. Nature 508,
>> 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/508161a
>>
>> Wesolek, A. (2014). Bridging the gap between Digital Measures and Digital
>> Commons in support of open access: Or, how I learned to stop worrying and
>> love human mediation. Collection Management 39(1), 32-42.
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.860856
>>
>> Xia, J., Gilchrist, S. B., Smith, N. X. P., Kingery, J. A., Radecki, J.
>> R., Wilhelm, R. L., Harrison, K. C., Ashby, M. L., & Mahn, A. J. A review
>> of open access self-archiving mandate policies. portal: Libraries and
>> the Academy 12(1), 85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0000
>>
>>
>>
>> INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES - PROBLEMS FILLING THEM
>>
>> (looking for overviews / reviews)
>>
>> Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that
>> support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services 30(1),
>> 43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028
>>
>> Carr, L., & Brody, T. (2007). Size isn’t everything: Sustainable
>> repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles. D-Lib
>> Magazine 13(7/8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/july2007-carr
>>
>> Chant, I. (2016). Increasing IR participation. Library Journal 141(3),
>> 20-21.
>>
>> Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional repositories:
>> Evaluating the reasons for non‐use of Cornell University’s installation of
>> DSpace. D-Lib Magazine 13(3/4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2007-davis
>>
>> Review of Davis & Connolly article:
>>
>> Blythe, K. (2007). The academic reward system is the primary influence
>> toward faculty non-participation in institutional repositories. Evidence
>> Based Library & Information Practice 2(4), 70-72.
>>
>> Ferreira, M., Rodrigues, E., Baptista, A. A., & Saraiva, R. (2008).
>> Carrots and sticks: Some ideas on how to create a successful institutional
>> repository. D-Lib Magazine 14 (1/2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/janu
>> ary2008-ferreira
>>
>> Jain, P. (2011). New trends and future applications/directions of
>> institutional repositories in academic institutions. Library Review 60(2),
>> 125-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531111113078
>>
>> Lagzian, F., Abrizah, A., & Wee, M. C. (2015). Critical success factors
>> for institutional repositories implementation. Electronic Library 33(2),
>> 196-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2013-0058
>>
>> March, R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing
>> the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems & Services 31(4),
>> 163-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022
>>
>> Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., Russell, B., &
>> Jamali, H. R. (2013). Have digital repositories come of age? The views of
>> library directors. Webology 10(2), 1-16. Retrieved from
>> http://www.webology.org/2013/v10n2/a111.pdf
>>
>> Poynder, R. (2016, September 22). Q&A with CNI’s Clifford Lynch: Time to
>> re-think the institutional repository? [Blog post]. Retrieved from
>> http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/q-with-cnis-clifford-l
>> ynch-time-to-re_22.html
>>
>> Salo, D. (2008). Innkeeper at the roach motel. Library Trends 57(2),
>> 98-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0031
>>
>> Van de Velde, E. (2016, July 24). Let IR RIP [Blog post]. Retrieved from
>> http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html
>>
>> --
>> Andrée Rathemacher  |  Professor / Head, Acquisitions
>> University Libraries, University of Rhode Island  |  (401) 874-5096  |
>> andree at uri.edu
>>
>>
>>
>> Dr Danny Kingsley
>> Head, Office of Scholarly Communication
>> Cambridge University Library
>> West Road, Cambridge CB39DR
>> P: +44 (0) 1223 747 437
>> M: +44 (0) 7711 500 564
>> E: dak45 at cam.ac.uk
>> T: @dannykay68
>> B: https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/
>> S: http://www.slideshare.net/DannyKingsley
>> ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3636-5939
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20161005/0aef8ec7/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 99012 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20161005/0aef8ec7/attachment-0001.tiff 


More information about the GOAL mailing list