[GOAL] [SCHOLCOMM] Help requested in identifying articles on OA Policies and IRs

Stevan Harnad amsciforum at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 13:33:13 BST 2016


A few references you missed, Andree:

Swan, A; Gargouri, Y; Hunt, M; & Harnad, S (2015) Open Access Policy:
Numbers, Analysis, Effectiveness. Pasteur4OA Workpackage 3 Report.
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/375854/

Harnad, S (2015) Open Access: What, Where, When, How and Why. In: Ethics,
Science, Technology, and Engineering: An International Resource eds. J.
Britt Holbrook & Carl Mitcham, (2nd edition of Encyclopedia of Science,
Technology, and Ethics, Farmington Hills MI: MacMillan Reference)
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/361704/

Harnad, S (2015) Optimizing Open Access Policy. The Serials Librarian,
69(2), 133-141 http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/381526/
<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/381526/>

Vincent-Lamarre, P, Boivin, J, Gargouri, Y, Larivière, V & Harnad,
(2016) Estimating
Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score.
<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/370203/>Journal of the  Association for
Information Science and Technology (JASIST)  67 (in press)
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/370203/

SH

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Danny Kingsley <dak45 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> While I have issues with what is happening with the UK OA policies (I very
> much disagree with the amount we are spending on hybrid), there is no doubt
> they work. At Cambridge University we have received our 10,000th submission
>  - that’s a unique article that is eligible to be claimed for the next
> Research Excellence Framework - into Apollo, the Cambridge repository. This
> is since we started our OA service on 1 April 2013 in response to the RCUK
> policy.
>
> https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=949
>
> We are receiving 50% of all of the research outputs produced by the
> University as a result of these funder policies.
>
> Researchers will not do it on their own. Institutions and funders need to
> decide if they want research to be available open access and if they do
> they need to both mandate it and also provide support within institutions
> to manage the processing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Danny
>
>
> Dr Danny Kingsley
> Head, Office of Scholarly Communication
> Cambridge University Library
> West Road, Cambridge CB39DR
> P: +44 (0) 1223 747 437
> M: +44 (0) 7711 500 564
> E: dak45 at cam.ac.uk
> T: @dannykay68
> B: https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/
> S: http://www.slideshare.net/DannyKingsley
> ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3636-5939
>
>
> On 4 Oct 2016, at 21:26, Andree Rathemacher <andree at uri.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi scholcomm folks,
>
> Julia Lovett and I are working on an article, based on a survey of
> University of Rhode Island faculty, on faculty attitudes about compliance
> with our permissions-based OA policy.
>
> As Christine Fruin and Shan Sutton noted in their recent C&RL article
> <http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.4.469>, there is not a whole lot out
> there on North American institutional OA policies. I've done LISTA, Scopus,
> and Web of Science searches, but I'm wondering if I've missed any reports,
> chapters, or other perhaps less-traditional outputs that have anything to
> do with *faculty author attitudes towards and compliance* *with OA
> policies*. I'll paste my current bibliography below so you can see what I
> have.
>
> Also, in the article, we would like to briefly make the point that
> librarians have long struggled with filling their IRs. There are many, many
> articles out there looking at specific cases, but I was hoping for a *literature
> review or recent comprehensive article*, if anyone knows of one. Of
> course there is the recent Van de Velde blog post
> <http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html> and Poynder
> interview with Lynch
> <http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/q-with-cnis-clifford-lynch-time-to-re_22.html>
> .
>
> Thanks so much for any help you can provide.
>
> List is below. Please excuse cross-posting to the COAPI list.
>
> Best,
> Andrée
>
> OPEN ACCESS POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
>
> Anderson, R. (2016). Why are there virtually no mandatory open access
> policies at American universities? Learned Publishing 29(3), 215-218.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1034
>
> Armbruster, C. (2011). Open access policy implementation: First results
> compared. Learned Publishing 24(4), 311-324.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110409
>
> Awre, C., Beeken, A., Jones, B., Stainthorp, P., & Stone, G. (2016).
> Communicating the open access policy landscape. Insights 29(2), 126-132.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.308
>
> Duranceau, E. F., & Kriegsman, S. (2016). Campus open access policy
> implementation models and implications for IR services. In B. B. Callicott,
> D. Scherer, & A. Wesolkek (Eds.), Making Institutional Repositories Work
> (pp. 87-106). Charleston insights in library, archival, and information
> sciences. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
>
> Duranceau, E. F., & Kriegsman, S. (2013). Implementing open access
> policies using institutional repositories. In P. Bluh, C. Hepfer, & M. L.
> Ramírez (Eds.), The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges (pp.
> 81-105). ALCTS papers on library technical services and collections 18.
> Chicago: Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, American
> Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites
> /ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/papers/ir_ch05_.pdf
>
> Emmett, A., & Peterson, T. (2010). Achieving consensus on the University
> of Kansas open-access policy. Research Library Issues 269, 5-7.
>
> Emmett, A., Stratton, J., Peterson, A. T., Church-Duran, J., & Haricombe,
> L. (2011). Toward open access: It takes a village. Journal of Library
> Administration 51(5/6), 557-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0193
> 0826.2011.589345
>
> Fruin, C., & Sutton, S. (2016). Strategies for success: Open access
> policies at North American educational institutions. College & Research
> Libraries 77(4), 469-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.4.469
>
> Gilbert, J., Kinger, M., & Kullman, L. (2011). Implementing an open access
> policy at Chalmers Institute of Technology. IATUL Annual Conference
> Proceedings 21, 1-9.
>
> Kern, B., & Wishnetsky, S. (2014). Adopting and implementing an open
> access policy: The library’s role. Serials Librarian 66(1-4), 196-203.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2014.880035
>
> Kipphut-Smith, S. (2014). Engaging in a campus-wide conversation about
> open access. Texas Library Journal 90(2), 70-71.
>
> Kipphut-Smith, S. (2014). “Good enough”: Developing a simple workflow for
> open access policy implementation. College & Undergraduate Libraries 21(3/4),
> 279-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2014.932263
>
> Ludwig, D. (2010). Open access at the University of Kansas. College &
> Research Libraries News 71(7), 360-363, 384.
>
> McGuigan, G. S. (2015). The NIH Public Access Policy and federally funded
> research: An analysis of problem recognition and agenda setting. Journal
> of Academic Librarianship 41(1), 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ac
> alib.2014.09.014
>
> Miller, J. (2011). Open access and liberal arts colleges: Looking beyond
> research institutions. College & Research Libraries News 72(1), 16-30.
>
> Shieber, S. (2009, June 30). University open-access policies as mandates
> [Blog post]. Retrieved from  https://blogs.harvard.edu/pam
> phlet/2009/06/30/university-open-access-policies-as-mandates/
>
> Smith, K. (2012). Why open access? The policy environment and process on
> one university campus. Insights 25(3), 246-250.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.3.246
>
> Taylor, A. (2013). Technical services report: Opening access for a new era
> of scholarly publishing. A report of the ALCTS Continuing Resources
> Section, Access to Continuing Resources Interest Group program, American
> Library Association Annual conference, Anaheim, June 2012. Technical
> Services Quarterly 30(2), 217-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0731
> 7131.2013.759833
>
> Vandegrift, M., & Colvin, G. (2012). Relational communications. College &
> Research Libraries News 73(7), 386-389.
>
> Van Noorden, R. (2014). Funders punish open-access dodgers. Nature 508,
> 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/508161a
>
> Wesolek, A. (2014). Bridging the gap between Digital Measures and Digital
> Commons in support of open access: Or, how I learned to stop worrying and
> love human mediation. Collection Management 39(1), 32-42.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.860856
>
> Xia, J., Gilchrist, S. B., Smith, N. X. P., Kingery, J. A., Radecki, J.
> R., Wilhelm, R. L., Harrison, K. C., Ashby, M. L., & Mahn, A. J. A review
> of open access self-archiving mandate policies. portal: Libraries and the
> Academy 12(1), 85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0000
>
>
>
> INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES - PROBLEMS FILLING THEM
>
> (looking for overviews / reviews)
>
> Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that
> support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services 30(1),
> 43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028
>
> Carr, L., & Brody, T. (2007). Size isn’t everything: Sustainable
> repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles. D-Lib Magazine
> 13(7/8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/july2007-carr
>
> Chant, I. (2016). Increasing IR participation. Library Journal 141(3),
> 20-21.
>
> Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional repositories:
> Evaluating the reasons for non‐use of Cornell University’s installation of
> DSpace. D-Lib Magazine 13(3/4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2007-davis
>
> Review of Davis & Connolly article:
>
> Blythe, K. (2007). The academic reward system is the primary influence
> toward faculty non-participation in institutional repositories. Evidence
> Based Library & Information Practice 2(4), 70-72.
>
> Ferreira, M., Rodrigues, E., Baptista, A. A., & Saraiva, R. (2008).
> Carrots and sticks: Some ideas on how to create a successful institutional
> repository. D-Lib Magazine 14 (1/2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/janu
> ary2008-ferreira
>
> Jain, P. (2011). New trends and future applications/directions of
> institutional repositories in academic institutions. Library Review 60(2),
> 125-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531111113078
>
> Lagzian, F., Abrizah, A., & Wee, M. C. (2015). Critical success factors
> for institutional repositories implementation. Electronic Library 33(2),
> 196-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2013-0058
>
> March, R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing
> the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems & Services 31(4),
> 163-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022
>
> Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., Russell, B., &
> Jamali, H. R. (2013). Have digital repositories come of age? The views of
> library directors. Webology 10(2), 1-16. Retrieved from
> http://www.webology.org/2013/v10n2/a111.pdf
>
> Poynder, R. (2016, September 22). Q&A with CNI’s Clifford Lynch: Time to
> re-think the institutional repository? [Blog post]. Retrieved from
> http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/q-with-cnis-clifford-l
> ynch-time-to-re_22.html
>
> Salo, D. (2008). Innkeeper at the roach motel. Library Trends 57(2),
> 98-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0031
>
> Van de Velde, E. (2016, July 24). Let IR RIP [Blog post]. Retrieved from
> http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html
>
> --
> Andrée Rathemacher  |  Professor / Head, Acquisitions
> University Libraries, University of Rhode Island  |  (401) 874-5096  |
> andree at uri.edu
>
>
>
> Dr Danny Kingsley
> Head, Office of Scholarly Communication
> Cambridge University Library
> West Road, Cambridge CB39DR
> P: +44 (0) 1223 747 437
> M: +44 (0) 7711 500 564
> E: dak45 at cam.ac.uk
> T: @dannykay68
> B: https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/
> S: http://www.slideshare.net/DannyKingsley
> ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3636-5939
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20161005/12e9c6b0/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 99012 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20161005/12e9c6b0/attachment-0001.tiff 


More information about the GOAL mailing list