[GOAL] SocArXiv debuts, as SSRN acquisition comes under scrutiny

Tue Jul 19 21:35:47 BST 2016

Inclusiveness is a lovely concept. However, from a discovery perspective, there is much to be said for discipline-based archives and ideally integrated indexing and linked data services like PubMed / PubMedCentral and the databanks that go with these services.

It strikes me that archives are more attractive to deposit in when they are what people want to use to access research.

I suspect that IRs have suffered from a design emphasis on preservation and metadata rather than use. The types of use facilitated by IRs are different from subject repositories, journals or databases. Liege with their OA policy is the exception as deposit in the IR flows into the tenure and promotion process.

If I deposit in my IR, can I please have my URL immediately rather than having to wait a few days for someone to approve the deposit? This is one of the attractions of services like SSRN.

What about buttons to automatically send the URL to my department and/or faculty’s communications feeds - twitter streams, websites, blogs, onsite computer screens? 

Why not connect the IR with the online CVs I have to constantly update? 

Could deposit in the IR be designed so that more is accomplished with fewer keystrokes on the part of the author?

my two bits,

Heather Morrison

> On Jul 19, 2016, at 1:37 PM, Ross-Hellauer, Anthony <ross-hellauer at sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Eric, all,
> 
> I completely agree with this. Especially because it could potentially be called the SSHArXiv!
> 
> Cue jaws theme ...
> 
> Best, tony
> 
> On 19 Jul 2016, at 19:03, "Éric Archambault" <eric.archambault at science-metrix.com> wrote:
> 
>   
> This type of venue is essential and certainly welcomed for the social sciences. Yet, it would be even greater a place if it also included the humanities and the arts. There is a considerable challenge in the SSH&A because there are far fewer authors on average on scholarly papers (1 to 2 authors on average) compared to the natural sciences (5 authors on average) and the health sciences (6 co-authors on average on papers). This means each social scientist and humanities scholar has considerably more work to make papers available in OA. Whereas authors in the natural sciences can afford to self-archive only 20% of the papers on average to have all the material available in OA, in the humanities, because of the sole authorship common in this domain of scholarly activity, 100% of the papers have to be self-archived. The level of effort is somewhat mitigated by the fact that output is commensurably reduced (as all the work of writing papers falls to a single person, rather than to a fifth or a sixth of a person). Still, the easier it is to archive, the more likely SSH&A scholars will be likely to self-archive. Would be nice if SocArXiv became a more inclusive AHSocArxiv. We have enough of the incoherent inclusion policies of arXiv, inclusiveness should be celebrated in OA – we should no longer be divided and conquered.
> 
> 
> Éric
> 
> 
> 
>   
> Eric Archambault, Ph.D.
> President and CEO | Président-directeur général
> Science-Metrix & 1science
> 
> T. 1.514.495.6505 x.111
> C. 1.514.518.0823
> F. 1.514.495.6523
> 
> 
>     
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
>   
> From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org] On Behalf Of Richard Poynder
> Sent: July 19, 2016 11:01 AM
> To: goal at eprints.org
> Subject: [GOAL] SocArXiv debuts, as SSRN acquisition comes under scrutiny
> 
> 
> 
>   
> The arrival of a new preprint server for the social sciences called SocArXiv comes just a month after news that Elsevier is acquiring the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), a preprint repository and online community founded in 1994 by two researchers.
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> Given the concern and disappointment expressed over the SSRN purchase by researchers, it is no surprise that the launch of SocArXiv has been very well received. Still smarting from Elsevier’s 2013 acquisition of Mendeley – another formerly independent service for managing and sharing scholarly papers – many (especially OA advocates) were appalled to hear that the publisher has bought a second OA asset. The reasons for this were encapsulated in a blog post by University of Iowa law professor Paul Gowder entitled “SSRN has been captured by the enemy of open knowledge”.
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> This concern has also attracted the attention of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) which has launched a review of the SSRN purchase. The FTC is currently contacting many institutions and experts in scholarly publishing to assess the implications of the acquisition, presumably in order to decide whether it needs to intervene in some way.
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> Elsevier is understandably keen to downplay the interest the US government is showing in its latest acquisition. “The Federal Trade Commission is conducting a routine, informal review of our acquisition of the Social Sciences Research network,” vice president and head of global corporate relations at Elsevier Tom Reller emailed me. “Elsevier’s interest in SSRN is and has been about SSRNs’ ethos, a place where it is free to upload, and free to download. We are working cooperatively with the FTC, and believe that the review will conclude favourably.”
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> In other words, Elsevier does not believe the FTC’s interest in its purchase will lead to a formal investigation.
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> But however timely SocArXiv’s launch may be, the service is not a response to the SSRN acquisition, the director of the new service, and professor of sociology at the University of Maryland, Philip Cohen assured me. “We were already in planning before we heard about the SSRN purchase.”
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> More here: http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/socarxiv-debuts-as-ssrn-acquisition.html
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>   
> 
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7688 / Virus Database: 4627/12641 - Release Date: 07/18/16
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GOAL mailing list
> GOAL at eprints.org
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

-- 
Dr. Heather Morrison
Assistant Professor
École des sciences de l'information / School of Information Studies
University of Ottawa
http://www.sis.uottawa.ca/faculty/hmorrison.html
Sustaining the Knowledge Commons http://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/
Heather.Morrison at uottawa.ca