[GOAL] Re: The Qualis and the silence of the Brazilian researchers

Jacinto Dávila jacinto.davila at gmail.com
Thu Apr 2 22:47:10 BST 2015


Publish that list Mr Tuffani. Openness is not only about allowing papers to
be read "in the Internet". But also about allowing auditing and supervision
of all sorts and at all levels. I understand you must summarize the
arguments for non-expert readers. But this is a gross over-simplification
of OA:

"

*Open Access*

Predatory journals are academic journals published by companies operating,
without scientific rigor, an important scientific communication initiative
that came up with the internet. This is the *Open Access
<http://legacy.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/fos/brief-port.htm>* (OA), the
editorial model of publishing articles in open access, based on the
charging of fees from authors or funding by scientific institutions.

Both in the OA as in the traditional model maintained by annual
subscriptions or fees per downloaded article from the Internet, reputable
journals take months or even over a year to review and accept articles, or
reject them.
"



On 2 April 2015 at 16:41, Jean-Claude Guédon <
jean.claude.guedon at umontreal.ca> wrote:

>  If some academics find it difficult publicly to denounce what obviously
> are rogue journals, others obviously will. It is only a question of
> perseverance. Furthermore, we need academics only to endorse journals that
> they know to be legitimate. Those without the ability to have five open
> sponsors will simply stand out in the list (that for colleagues who might
> be scared of being sued).
>
> Besides, Mr. Tuffani, all you have to do is publish the list of the 200
> doubtful titles and ask who would be willing to put his/her good name
> behind any of these journals. If it turns out that some are actually
> legitimate, we shall soon know. They will have no difficulty in garnering
> five sponsors who can be easily identified and queried as to their decision
> to support a particular title.
>
> Jean-Claude Guédon
>
>
>   --
>
> Jean-Claude Guédon
> Professeur titulaire
> Littérature comparée
> Université de Montréal
>
>
>
>   Le jeudi 02 avril 2015 à 17:28 -0300, Mauricio Tuffani a écrit :
>
> I will write about the suggestions of Mrs. Morrison and Mr. Guédon to
> CAPES. But I sent them previously for this Brazilian federal agency, as I
> reported in my post yesterday, whose translation is available in the page
> of the link below.
>
>  ​"​
>
>  The Qualis and the silence of the Brazilian researchers
>
>  ​"​
>
>
>
> http://mauriciotuffani.blogfolha.uol.com.br/the-qualis-and-the-silence-of-the-brazilian-researchers/
>
> Best regards,
>
> ***************************
> Maurício Tuffani
> Journalist, science writer
> São Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Mobile: +55 11 99164-8443
> Phone: +55 11 2366-9949
> http://folha.com/mauriciotuffani
> mauricio at tuffani.net
> ***************************
>
>  _______________________________________________
> GOAL mailing listGOAL at eprints.orghttp://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GOAL mailing list
> GOAL at eprints.org
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>
>


-- 
Jacinto Dávila
http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/ingenieria/jacinto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20150402/85a86861/attachment.html 


More information about the GOAL mailing list