[GOAL] Re: Censorship? Seriously? (Re: Re: [sparc-oaforum] Re: Disruption vs. Protection)
Thomas Krichel
krichel at openlib.org
Mon Sep 16 21:15:44 BST 2013
Couture Marc writes
> As previous messages in this thread clearly show, the ultimate fate
> of the subscription model, and how it will unfold, is completely
> unknown,
Stevan has written many times that open access is optimal and
inevitable. If you accept this what room is there left for
subscriptions? I don't see any.
> Stevan points out that actions or policies which may seem justified
> locally, because they allow for short term savings, can be globally
> harmful in the long term.
Cutting subscriptions is benefical locally, because it saves money
and/or allows to improve institutional visibility. And it is
beneficial globally as it increases incentives for academics to make
papers available in IRs or with open access publishers because
otherwise they loose more impact.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
More information about the GOAL
mailing list