[GOAL] RCUK policy: relationship between green and CC-BY-NC
Dan Stowell
dan.stowell at eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Wed Jan 30 15:05:57 GMT 2013
Dear all,
We're having some discussion in our research group here about the RCUK
policy, and there's a point of interpretation, which I wonder if you've
resolved yourselves.
The question is whether RCUK policy on green OA implies a specific
licence, and in particular whether it implies CC-BY-NC. I don't really
want to discuss what the policy *should* be, if you don't mind - just
trying to understand what the policy *is*.
Linked from the RCUK's main outputs page
<http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/outputs.aspx>
are two documents. One is the main policy document
<http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUK%20_Policy_on_Access_to_Research_Outputs.pdf>
- it clearly says (sec 4.1) that gold must be CC-BY, while for green
(sec 4.2) it says "the journal must allow deposit [...] in other
repositories, without restrictions on non-commercial re-use and within a
defined period." So it seems clear to me that that is not a positive
requirement for a specific licence, but a negative requirement that we
cannot do green OA that bans commercial use. The guidance document
linked just below it does not narrow down green any further.
However, linked from *the same page* is a presentation
<http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/Thorley_RCUK_November2012.pdf) which
very clearly (slide 10) says "Green (at least post print) with a maximum
embargo period of 6(12) months, and CC-BY-NC".
Both of these cannot be true, or else I'm misinterpreting something.
Does the Thorley presentation contain a mistaken assertion, or a missing
context?
Thanks
Dan
--
Dan Stowell
Postdoctoral Research Assistant
Centre for Digital Music
Queen Mary, University of London
Mile End Road, London E1 4NS
http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/digitalmusic/people/dans.htm
http://www.mcld.co.uk/
More information about the GOAL
mailing list