[GOAL] Re: Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
Gerritsma, Wouter
wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl
Sat Dec 21 19:50:45 GMT 2013
Dear Bo-Christer,
I am aware of the really useful studies your group makes.
However, I am looking into the the transparence of the eer review process on the journals side.
A self included analysis on the journals side, say yearly, on the number of submissions, the acceptance rates would be helpful as an indicators for transparence of the peer review process. Another of such examples is thanking the peer reviewers eg. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0737-8831&volume=31&issue=4&articleid=17099955&show=html In that case you have an indication that additional people (beyonf the editorial board) wer involved in the peer review process.
Thanks for your reading tips. But it is not exactly what I was looking for.
Wouter
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org] On Behalf Of Bo-Christer Björk
Sent: zaterdag 21 december 2013 18:27
To: goal at eprints.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
You could check out
http://openaccesspublishing.org/oa11/article.pdf
as well as
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157713000710
green version
http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto/preprints/Journalacceptancerates.pdf
Bo-Christer
On 12/21/13 5:43 PM, Gerritsma, Wouter wrote:
Dear all,
With regards to this really excellent initiative I am looking in to the various degrees in transparency of the peer review process. Has anybody examples at hand of editorials, where they give an overview of number of articles submitted, and ultimately accepted, and the time the whole cycle from submission to final publication actually took. So now and then I have seen this in journals, but can't find any example right now.
I would be grateful for some hints.
Wouter
Wouter Gerritsma
Team leader research support
Information Specialist - Bibliometrician
Wageningen UR Library
PO box 9100
6700 HA Wageningen
The Netherlands
++31 3174 83052
Wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl<mailto:Wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl%0d>
wageningenur.nl/library<http://wageningenur.nl/library>
@wowter<http://twitter.com/Wowter/>
wowter.net<http://wowter.net/>
#AWCP http://tinyurl.com/mk65m36
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org<mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org> [mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org] On Behalf Of Claire Redhead
Sent: donderdag 19 december 2013 16:41
To: goal at eprints.org<mailto:goal at eprints.org>
Subject: [GOAL] Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
The Committee on Publication Ethics<http://publicationethics.org/%E2%80%8E>, the Directory of Open Access Journals<http://www.doaj.org/>, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association<http://oaspa.org/>, and the World Association of Medical Editors<http://www.wame.org/> are scholarly organizations that have seen an increase in the number of membership applications from both legitimate and non-legitimate publishers and journals. Our organizations have collaborated in an effort to identify principles of transparency and best practice that set apart legitimate journals and publishers from non-legitimate ones and to clarify that these principles form part of the criteria on which membership applications will be evaluated.
This is a work in progress and we welcome feedback on the general principles and the specific criteria. Please see the full statement<http://oaspa.org/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing/> on the OASPA blog (http://oaspa.org/blog/).
Claire Redhead
Membership & Communications Manager
Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, OASPA
http://oaspa.org/
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL at eprints.org<mailto:GOAL at eprints.org>
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20131221/b4ae50a0/attachment-0001.html
More information about the GOAL
mailing list