[GOAL] Re: Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

[Bo-Christer Björk]

You could check out
http://openaccesspublishing.org/oa11/article.pdf

as well as

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157713000710

green version

http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto/preprints/Journalacceptancerates.pdf

Bo-Christer

On 12/21/13 5:43 PM, Gerritsma, Wouter wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> With regards to this really excellent initiative I am looking in to 
> the various degrees in transparency of the peer review process. Has 
> anybody examples at hand of editorials, where they give an overview of 
> number of articles submitted, and ultimately accepted, and the time 
> the whole cycle from submission to final publication actually took. So 
> now and then I have seen this in journals, but can't find any example 
> right now.
>
> I would be grateful for some hints.
>
> Wouter
>
> Wouter Gerritsma
>
> Team leader research support
>
> Information Specialist -- Bibliometrician
>
> Wageningen UR Library
>
> PO box 9100
>
> 6700 HA Wageningen
>
> The Netherlands
>
> ++31 3174 83052
>
> Wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl <mailto:Wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl%0d>__
>
> wageningenur.nl/library <http://wageningenur.nl/library>
>
> @wowter <http://twitter.com/Wowter/>
>
> wowter.net <http://wowter.net/>
>
> #AWCPhttp://tinyurl.com/mk65m36
>
> *From:*goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *Claire Redhead
> *Sent:* donderdag 19 december 2013 16:41
> *To:* goal at eprints.org
> *Subject:* [GOAL] Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and 
> Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
>
> The Committee on Publication Ethics 
> <http://publicationethics.org/%E2%80%8E>, the Directory of Open Access 
> Journals <http://www.doaj.org/>, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers 
> Association <http://oaspa.org/>, and the World Association of Medical 
> Editors <http://www.wame.org/>are scholarly organizations that have 
> seen an increase in the number of membership applications from both 
> legitimate and non-legitimate publishers and journals. Our 
> organizations have collaborated in an effort to identify principles of 
> transparency and best practice that set apart legitimate journals and 
> publishers from non-legitimate ones and to clarify that these 
> principles form part of the criteria on which membership applications 
> will be evaluated.
>
> This is a work in progress and we welcome feedback on the general 
> principles and the specific criteria. Please see the full statement 
> <http://oaspa.org/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing/> 
> on the OASPA blog (http://oaspa.org/blog/).
>
>
> Claire Redhead
> Membership & Communications Manager
> Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, OASPA
> http://oaspa.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GOAL mailing list
> GOAL at eprints.org
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20131221/4e4312f0/attachment.html