[GOAL] Canadian Journal of Communication is a not-so-bad role model
Heather Morrison
heatherm at eln.bc.ca
Sun Oct 14 21:51:37 BST 2012
The Canadian Journal of Communication is just one example of a large
number of small society / association journals, published by scholars
for scholars. While not fully open access, CJC is a good role model in
many respects.
Subscription rates are $100 - $165 year (depending on print / online,
etc.). Like many such journals, CJC has never been in the practice of
raising subscription prices at rates above inflation year after year
as many commercial publishers have. Journals like CJC did not create
the crisis in scholarly communication, but many have been affected by
it (libraries have had to cancel many journals like CJC, even at such
low rates, to pay for the big publishers' big deals.)
Subscription information can be found here:
http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/about/subscriptions
CJC makes all of its issues freely available after one year, using the
CC-BY-NC-ND license. This is a voluntary action which is not at all
required by any funding agency policy. The CJC statement on this
policy clearly indicates that the purpose of publication is
dissemination of scholarly work, not making money for everyone -
details:
"The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly
research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a not-for-profit
regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees
itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make
content available online now that the technology allows for such a
possibility. In keeping with this principle, the journal has published
all of its back issues online. At the same time, were an author who
contributed to the journal prior to the journal putting in place an
explicit request for online rights to request that his or her work be
removed from the CJC-Online website, the journal would remove the work.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Journal of Communication agree to
release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-
Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada Licence" from: http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
On self-archiving, CJC is romeo blue - self-archiving of peer-reviewed
postprint okay, preprints unclear. This may be more a reflection of
the UK / large international publisher focus of Sherpa RoMEO rather
than CJC per se, i.e. it is not clear whether anyone has worked very
hard with publishers like this to encourage and clarify self-archiving
rights.
CJC's policies are far from perfect - I'm not crazy about the charging
for coursepacks through Access Copyright, for example - however
journals like this did not create the problem in scholarly publishing,
and considering the low cost of journal subscriptions, it should be
possible for libraries to figure out how to support journals like this
to thrive in a fully open access future. If there are small society
journals like this in the UK, my suggestion is that RCUK look into
providing infrastructure and support for them so that they can move
into an online OA future, assuming RCUK can afford to subsidize
publishing.
my two bits,
Heather Morrison
More information about the GOAL
mailing list