[GOAL] Re: {Disarmed} Re: A census of OA in the Netherlands

[Isidro F. Aguillo]

Dear all,

The post is really very useful and more info in a similar fashion about 
other countries should be prepared. Regarding the issue of "carrots and 
sticks" I attended the presentation of the Irish national academic 
repository (http://rian.ie/) during the past OAI7 conference at Geneve 
and it was impressive. This is a good starting model about the added 
value that a repository should provide, specially for actual end-users 
that are the scientists not the librarians (no puns intended). The 
interface is very clean, options for searching and recovering are 
powerful and best of all, there is a lot of very valuable figures 
everywhere. Most of the Irish researchers probably will deposit because 
it is a perfect showcase for their full activity results.

I will like to know about other similar initiatives.


El 10/02/2012 16:10, Gerritsma, Wouter escribió:
>
> Steven
>
> Mandated OA was announced early 2011 for Earsmus University Rotterdam. 
> Unfortunately this has had no effect on deposit rates whatsoever, it 
> is still one of the lowest deposit rates in Nl. Mandates without 
> carrots or sticks are not likely to work, despite the Liege success.
>
> BTW this post was partly inspired by questions you asked in Leiden 
> back in 2010(?) at the van Raan farewell symposium.
>
> Wouter
>
> *From:*goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *Stevan Harnad
> *Sent:* vrijdag 10 februari 2012 15:09
> *To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
> *Subject:* [GOAL] {Disarmed} Re: A census of OA in the Netherlands
>
> On 2012-02-10, at 8:47 AM, Gerritsma, Wouter wrote:
>
>
>
> An analysis of OA deposits in Dutch repositories
>
> http://wowter.net/2012/02/10/a-census-of-open-access-repositories-in-the-netherlands/
>
> Deposits rates at Dutch universities vary between 7% and 40% for articles.
>
> Are well in the 80% for PhD-theses.
>
> There remains a lot of work to be done.
>
> Suggestion: Mandate deposit.
>
> Mandated deposit rates are 60%+ rising toward 100%.
>
> Especially with the right mandate: Immediate-Deposit/Optional-Access 
> [ID/OA],
>
> Liege model: deposit is designated as the sole mechanism for submitting
>
> refereed research for performance review.
>
> Research funders can reinforce institutional mandates by mandating 
> deposit too,
>
> as a condition of funding.
>
> http://roarmap.eprints.org
>
>      Wouter Gerritsma
>
>     Information Specialist -- Bibliometrician
>
>     Wageningen UR Library
>
>     PO box 9100
>
>     6700 HA Wageningen
>
>     The Netherlands
>
>     ++31 3174 83052
>
>     Wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl <mailto:Wouter.gerritsma at wur.nl%0d>
>
>     library.wur.nl <http://library.wur.nl/>
>
>     @wowter <http://twitter.com/Wowter/>
>
>     wowter.net <http://wowter.net/>
>
>     *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "x-msg:"
>     claiming to be tinyurl.com/c86gqyr <x-msg://212/tinyurl.com/c86gqyr>*
>
>     **
>
>     <image001.png>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     GOAL mailing list
>     GOAL at eprints.org <mailto:GOAL at eprints.org>
>     http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GOAL mailing list
> GOAL at eprints.org
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal


-- 
===============================

Isidro F. Aguillo, HonPhD

The Cybermetrics Lab
IPP-CCHS-CSIC
Albasanz, 26-28 (3C1)
28037 Madrid. Spain

isidro.aguillo @ cchs.csic.es

===============================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120210/3231dc8c/attachment.html