[EP-tech] Re: Editoring speed problem and Review queue option
Hugo F. Alrøe
hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 09:27:10 GMT 2015
Thank you for the advice, Yuri.
It would be very good if the speed problem could be solved, and if I get
some indication that this can and will be done, we can wait for this
solution. As I said, it is only recently that we tracked down what we
believe is the cause of the slow speed in review work.
I should say that we are still running on EPrints 3.3.10, because the
upgrade to 3.3.14 involves upgrading the Linux system and we have been a
bit reluctant to do this before we had to. But we have plans to do the
upgrade soon, to be better able to use the Bazaar options Coversheets and
Hugo F. Alrøe
Email: hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com
Phone: +45 61775599
2015-12-18 10:10 GMT+01:00 Yuri <yurj at alfa.it>:
> Isn't better to fix the slowness? i wouldn't depend, on big projects, on
> plugins found on Bazaar if I'm not sure they're well mantained.
> Il 18/12/2015 09:39, Hugo F. Alrøe ha scritto:
> > Hi
> > We have experienced speed problems when editoring on our archive
> > Organic Eprints (www.orgprints.org <http://www.orgprints.org>). We
> > have +30 editors with responsibilities for different countries and
> > projects, and some of them, but only some, experience that the system
> > is very slow when they are working with the review buffer. Search etc.
> > is not affected.
> > I finally found out that the number of editorial rights restrictions
> > affect the speed of showing the review buffer substantially. We have
> > some 16 eprint types (yes, I know, too many, but the archive has many
> > different kinds of eprints), and one of these (conference submissions)
> > has to be handled by different editors. This means most of our
> > national editors have 15 eprint types (all but the conference
> > submissions) in their editorial rights restrictions, to avoid
> > conference submissions being moved into the archive prematurely by the
> > national editors. Some editors have a number of countries and projects
> > as well in their editorial rights restrictions, which means that
> > showing the buffer can be veeery slow (like, go get a cup of coffee,
> > start on something else, and forget about it).
> > To solve this problem, I think about handling the conference
> > submissions differently. In the ePrints Bazaar I found the Reviewed
> > queue package, which offers a functionality that potentially can meet
> > this purpose by establishing an additional review buffer.
> > For this to work however, eprints of type conference submissions
> > should go automatically into this additional buffer. Is this possible?
> > And if so, how?
> > And preferably it should be possible to restrict most editors from
> > seeing this additional buffer. We have editors with different powers
> > already (some being able to modify the subject trees to e.g. add new
> > research affiliations). But I am not sure whether the additional
> > buffer established by Reviewed queue can be allocated to a specific
> > editor type. Is this possible?
> > Can anybody help on these questions?
> > Best regards
> > Hugo Alroe
> > Initiator (in 2002) of Organic Eprints and presently temporary archive
> > administrator.
> > Email: hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com <mailto:hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com>
> > *** Options:
> > *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> > *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> > *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Eprints-tech