[EP-tech] Re: Editoring speed problem and Review queue option
yurj at alfa.it
Fri Dec 18 09:10:31 GMT 2015
Isn't better to fix the slowness? i wouldn't depend, on big projects, on
plugins found on Bazaar if I'm not sure they're well mantained.
Il 18/12/2015 09:39, Hugo F. Alrøe ha scritto:
> We have experienced speed problems when editoring on our archive
> Organic Eprints (www.orgprints.org <http://www.orgprints.org>). We
> have +30 editors with responsibilities for different countries and
> projects, and some of them, but only some, experience that the system
> is very slow when they are working with the review buffer. Search etc.
> is not affected.
> I finally found out that the number of editorial rights restrictions
> affect the speed of showing the review buffer substantially. We have
> some 16 eprint types (yes, I know, too many, but the archive has many
> different kinds of eprints), and one of these (conference submissions)
> has to be handled by different editors. This means most of our
> national editors have 15 eprint types (all but the conference
> submissions) in their editorial rights restrictions, to avoid
> conference submissions being moved into the archive prematurely by the
> national editors. Some editors have a number of countries and projects
> as well in their editorial rights restrictions, which means that
> showing the buffer can be veeery slow (like, go get a cup of coffee,
> start on something else, and forget about it).
> To solve this problem, I think about handling the conference
> submissions differently. In the ePrints Bazaar I found the Reviewed
> queue package, which offers a functionality that potentially can meet
> this purpose by establishing an additional review buffer.
> For this to work however, eprints of type conference submissions
> should go automatically into this additional buffer. Is this possible?
> And if so, how?
> And preferably it should be possible to restrict most editors from
> seeing this additional buffer. We have editors with different powers
> already (some being able to modify the subject trees to e.g. add new
> research affiliations). But I am not sure whether the additional
> buffer established by Reviewed queue can be allocated to a specific
> editor type. Is this possible?
> Can anybody help on these questions?
> Best regards
> Hugo Alroe
> Initiator (in 2002) of Organic Eprints and presently temporary archive
> Email: hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com <mailto:hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com>
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
More information about the Eprints-tech