[EP-tech] Re: Ubuntu dependencies
sf2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Mar 11 15:25:43 GMT 2014
Nice reply Gunnar (and long time no hear!)...
xpdf > I'd say something around the poppler-utils package and pdftotext
which is used internally by EPrints.
btw no explicit dependencies were added in 3.3.12's debian package.
On 11/03/14 14:56, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> David McElroy dijo [Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:16:52AM +0000]:
>> Hi All,
>> Just doing an eprints install for an internal test server here and I've came up against a vast amount of unnecessary dependencies.
>> mcelroy at st-ep01:~$ sudo apt-get install eprints
>> The following extra packages will be installed:
>> antiword cups-bsd cups-client cups-common elinks elinks-data fontconfig fontconfig-config fonts-dejavu-core fonts-lmodern gcj-4.8-jre-lib ghostscript
>> gsfonts gsfonts-x11 hicolor-icon-theme imagemagick imagemagick-common libapache2-mod-perl2 libapache2-reload-perl libarchive-any-perl
>> samba-common-bin shared-mime-info smbclient tcl8.6 tcl8.6-lib tex-common texlive-base texlive-binaries texlive-luatex tk8.6 tk8.6-lib ttf-dejavu-core
>> unzip update-inetd x11-common x11-utils x11-xserver-utils xbitmaps xdg-utils xfonts-encodings xfonts-utils xpdf xterm
>> I checked the dependencies to confirm you guys hadn't added x11(!) to the dependencies recently:
>> Anyone every came across this before when installing on a fresh Ubuntu 13.10 Server?
> There are many transitive dependencies and recommendations coming into
> play here. You do not need to have the xserver-xorg-* packages
> installed (that is the X server), but you will have many X11 libraries
> — In my case, gsfonts-x11, libx11-6, libx11-data,
> libx11-protocol-perl, libx11-xcb1, x11-common, x11-utils and
> x11-xserver-utils. Just as an example, you could try removing some of
> them from aptitude (and _not_ committing the change). For example,
> x11-common is installed because libice6, libxtst6, xfonts-encodings
> and xfonts-utils all depend on it. xfonts-utils is installed because
> gsfonts-x11 and lmodern depend on it.
> xfonts-utils can be safely removed from the system: It was installed
> just as a "recommended" package by xpdf. Finally, xpdf is directly
> depended on by eprints.
> Now, why is xpdf listed as a dependency? I cannot give you an
> answer... I found it only mentioned in
> perl_lib/ParaTools/DocParser/Standard.pm, although didn't find it as
> directly used. I doubt it is used for extracting information from PDFs
> (as it is a viewer, not a general manipulator as ghostscript would
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
More information about the Eprints-tech