[EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources

Peter West pjw at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Nov 29 13:47:50 GMT 2013


Hi
checksum errors on the bazaar can be resolved by going to the developer 
tools tab (on the admin bazaar page). Then select "edit" and then "save 
and return" - this should generate a new checksum for you (you don't 
need to actually edit anything).

N.B. I have used this trick to allow me to disable & uninstall stuff but 
I have not tried it for an upgrade so please let me know if it works for 
that too.

Thanks
Peter

On 29/11/13 13:26, John Salter wrote:
>
> I was hoping that would be the answer :o)
>
> How do I resolve this (when updating the epm):
>
> Checksum mismatch encountered for lang/en/phrases/irstats2.xml
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
> *From:*eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk 
> [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *sf2
> *Sent:* 29 November 2013 11:56
> *To:* eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> *Subject:* [EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in 
> HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources
>
> John,
>
> Try with the latest (0.0.5)?
>
> Seb
>
> On 29.11.2013 11:32, John Salter wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     We've currently got IRStats 0.0.3 (beta) on our server.
>
>     We don’t have ids for authors, so have a set configured:
>
>     # just using creators_name
>
>     {
>
>          'name' => 'creators',
>
>          'field' => 'creators',
>
>          'use_ids' => 0,
>
>     },
>
>       
>
>     This results in same-authors not getting grouped - the reason looks like the 'name' hash isn't turned into something that can be compared.
>
>     In the database, the following is stored:
>
>       
>
>     mysql> select * from irstats2_sets_creators LIMIT 10;
>
>     +-----------------+--------------+
>
>     | set_value       | set_eprintid |
>
>     +-----------------+--------------+
>
>     | HASH(0x3e22700) |            5 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f77510) |         1864 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f77510) |         8946 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f77540) |         7304 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f775b8) |          407 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f775d0) |         4023 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f775d0) |         7339 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f77630) |          393 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f776c0) |         6006 |
>
>     | HASH(0x3f776d8) |         5064 |
>
>     +-----------------+--------------+
>
>       
>
>     Has anyone else come across this?
>
>     If so, is a more recent version (0.0.5) better?
>
>     If not, I'll see if I can fix it!
>
>       
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     John
>
>       
>
>       
>
>       
>
>     *** Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>
>     *** Archive:http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
>
>     *** EPrints community wiki:http://wiki.eprints.org/
>
>     *** EPrints developers Forum:http://forum.eprints.org/
>
>
>
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/

-- 
Peter J. West
EPrints Services
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, UK
pjw at ecs.soton.ac.uk



More information about the Eprints-tech mailing list