[EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources

Sebastien Francois sf2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Dec 2 10:38:18 GMT 2013


Ha OK! Do you have creators_id set-up on your system?

Seb.

On 02/12/13 10:29, John Salter wrote:
>
> It was more inconsistencies in our author names - things like "Jones, 
> M" and "Jones, M."...
>
> Bring on the ORCID's! :o)
>
> *From:*eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk 
> [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *sf2
> *Sent:* 29 November 2013 14:41
> *To:* eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> *Subject:* [EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in 
> HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources
>
> No worries.
>
> process_stats --uninstall should remove all the irstats2 tables :)
>
> Seb.
>
> On 29.11.2013 14:14, John Salter wrote:
>
>     Thanks for the tip - I crowbarred it onto our dev server - but will try your method on the live one - and let you know.
>
>       
>
>     And thanks Seb - this resolved the issue.
>
>     It doesn't clean our data up - which is the next hurdle :o)
>
>
>       
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     John
>
>       
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>
>     From:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk  <mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk>  [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk  <mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk>] On Behalf Of Peter West
>
>     Sent: 29 November 2013 13:48
>
>     To:eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk  <mailto:eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk>Subject: [EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources
>
>       
>
>     Hi
>
>     checksum errors on the bazaar can be resolved by going to the developer
>
>     tools tab (on the admin bazaar page). Then select "edit" and then "save
>
>     and return" - this should generate a new checksum for you (you don't
>
>     need to actually edit anything).
>
>       
>
>     N.B. I have used this trick to allow me to disable & uninstall stuff but
>
>     I have not tried it for an upgrade so please let me know if it works for
>
>     that too.
>
>       
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Peter
>
>       
>
>     On 29/11/13 13:26, John Salter wrote:
>
>         I was hoping that would be the answer :o) How do I resolve
>         this (when updating the epm): Checksum mismatch encountered
>         for lang/en/phrases/irstats2.xml Cheers, John
>         *From:*eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk
>         <mailto:*eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>         [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk
>         <mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk>] *On Behalf Of
>         *sf2 *Sent:* 29 November 2013 11:56 *To:*
>         eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk
>         <mailto:eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk> *Subject:* [EP-tech] Re:
>         IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in HASH(0x...) in set
>         and non-grouping of resources John, Try with the latest
>         (0.0.5)? Seb On 29.11.2013 11:32, John Salter wrote: Hi, We've
>         currently got IRStats 0.0.3 (beta) on our server. We don't
>         have ids for authors, so have a set configured: # just using
>         creators_name { 'name' => 'creators', 'field' => 'creators',
>         'use_ids' => 0, }, This results in same-authors not getting
>         grouped - the reason looks like the 'name' hash isn't turned
>         into something that can be compared. In the database, the
>         following is stored: mysql> select * from
>         irstats2_sets_creators LIMIT 10;
>         +-----------------+--------------+ | set_value | set_eprintid
>         | +-----------------+--------------+ | HASH(0x3e22700) | 5 | |
>         HASH(0x3f77510) | 1864 | | HASH(0x3f77510) | 8946 | |
>         HASH(0x3f77540) | 7304 | | HASH(0x3f775b8) | 407 | |
>         HASH(0x3f775d0) | 4023 | | HASH(0x3f775d0) | 7339 | |
>         HASH(0x3f77630) | 393 | | HASH(0x3f776c0) | 6006 | |
>         HASH(0x3f776d8) | 5064 | +-----------------+--------------+
>         Has anyone else come across this? If so, is a more recent
>         version (0.0.5) better? If not, I'll see if I can fix it!
>         Cheers, John ***
>         Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>         *** Archive:http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints
>         community wiki:http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** EPrints developers
>         Forum:http://forum.eprints.org/ *** Options:
>         http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>         *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints
>         community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** EPrints
>         developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
>
>     -- 
>
>     Peter J. West
>
>     EPrints Services
>
>     School of Electronics and Computer Science
>
>     University of Southampton, UK
>
>     pjw at ecs.soton.ac.uk  <mailto:pjw at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>
>       
>
>     *** Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>
>     *** Archive:http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
>
>     *** EPrints community wiki:http://wiki.eprints.org/
>
>     *** EPrints developers Forum:http://forum.eprints.org/
>
>       
>
>     *** Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>
>     *** Archive:http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
>
>     *** EPrints community wiki:http://wiki.eprints.org/
>
>     *** EPrints developers Forum:http://forum.eprints.org/
>
>
>
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/eprints-tech/attachments/20131202/dae123a9/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Eprints-tech mailing list