[Buildingdata] Extension number

[Alexander Dutton]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

At the moment we have
<|http://vocab.ox.ac.uk/ad-hoc-data-ox/oxfordExtensionNumber> for
internal telephone extension numbers. Is it worth generalising to
oo:telephoneExtension, with the network being encoded in the datatype
(like skos:notation)?

e.g.:

<#alex> v:tel <+441865613483> ;
  oo:telephoneExtension
"13483"^^<https://data.ox.ac.uk/id/notation/extensionNumber> .

Or:

<#alex> oo:telephoneExtension [ a vcard:Voice ; rdf:value "13483" ;
oo:telephoneNetwork <#network> ]

Some extensions aren't on the public phone network, so we can't really do:

|||<#alex> v:tel <+441865613483> .

||||||<+441865613483>|| oo:telephoneExtension ||
|||[ rdf:value "13483" ; oo:telephoneNetwork <#network> ]| |

Our phone directory lists about three networks (what with the
hospitals), and tie lines between them. With a bit of craftiness this
could be encoded, allowing clever agents to present the right tie prefix
to users. ([ a tie:TieLie ; tie:from <#uni> ; tie:to <#hospital> ;
tie:prefix "123" ])

Yours,

Alex
|

- -- 
Alexander Dutton
Linked Open Data Architect, Office of the CIO; data.ox.ac.uk, OxPoints
IT Services, University of Oxford, ℡ 01865 (6)13483
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ89o2AAoJEPotabD1ANF7kLwH/1ey7EihxG2Pcp7EgDlGDDAm
X1efRJc5R/xbRpOxz+P+Wa/TsrPOG0hPsgxvj/2f5it5tTsm5fcq7mbr45uKhb3f
l9vNZul5wfki4ZiQeOqR9G30wHNssICMcDmtXuyqP3ZM1715uDEKQJR1yCXKUim/
uYOpzFDmBFvtU5T8dq95PoXVYnWwxlvGzzLECih3CTJlZaqrXfclZfKvND4Cg1Yr
ZqmSDtYOdAbWG/OMDDLQn3m8J/cBQJHoZeir9kiQWVu1cCLixyZCxIc2SIn1nRZ6
1Iv8weVQVgjQkCF5cwFp2DKXZzRJRQ/2ScbBQXJJoYaXe1XDx/kRbIAZu3vlONQ=
=kHCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----