[Buildingdata] Re: Catalogues of stuff that's not data

[Christopher Gutteridge]

Looks good. I've gone in and added some bits to the description and 
corrected cat:item to link to cat:Catalog not dcat:Catalog.




On 16/12/2013 13:25, Alexander Dutton wrote:
> On 16/12/13 10:14, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
>> OK. I'll do that then.
> I got bored again, so I had a go at aligning it. I've also added a bit
> of custom RDF to encode the sub-class/sub-property relationships with dcat.
>
>> I think enough smart people have looked at dcat
>> that we would be nuts to mess with it.
>>
>> Who controls the namespace on purl.org?
> Me, but if we're Americanizing it, then we'll probably want a new
> namespace URI that doesn't end 'ue'.
>
> Unfortunately, purl.org ain't allowing logins at the moment.
>
>> One annoyance with neologism is that I can't see how to make it add
>> attributes that are not strictly bound to the class.
>>
>> eg. we want to say 'use dcterms:description' as part of the draft
>> 'application profile' but that's not the same as the ontology.
> I've added a note about foaf:primaryTopic to the comment for
> CatalogRecord. That's probably the best we're able to do.
>
> - Alex
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Buildingdata mailing list
> Buildingdata at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/buildingdata

-- 
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg

University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/buildingdata/attachments/20131217/c554a10c/attachment.html