[Buildingdata] Re: Catalogues of stuff that's not data

[Alexander Dutton]

On 16/12/13 10:14, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
> OK. I'll do that then.

I got bored again, so I had a go at aligning it. I've also added a bit
of custom RDF to encode the sub-class/sub-property relationships with dcat.

> I think enough smart people have looked at dcat
> that we would be nuts to mess with it.
> 
> Who controls the namespace on purl.org?

Me, but if we're Americanizing it, then we'll probably want a new
namespace URI that doesn't end 'ue'.

Unfortunately, purl.org ain't allowing logins at the moment.

> One annoyance with neologism is that I can't see how to make it add
> attributes that are not strictly bound to the class.
> 
> eg. we want to say 'use dcterms:description' as part of the draft
> 'application profile' but that's not the same as the ontology.

I've added a note about foaf:primaryTopic to the comment for
CatalogRecord. That's probably the best we're able to do.

- Alex


-- 
Alexander Dutton
Linked Open Data Architect, Office of the CIO; data.ox.ac.uk, OxPoints
IT Services, University of Oxford, ℡ 01865 (6)13483

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/buildingdata/attachments/20131216/722e42ea/attachment.bin