[Buildingdata] Re: Catalogues of stuff that's not data

[Christopher Gutteridge]

OK. I'll do that then. I think enough smart people have looked at dcat 
that we would be nuts to mess with it.

Who controls the namespace on purl.org?

One annoyance with neologism is that I can't see how to make it add 
attributes that are not strictly bound to the class.

eg. we want to say 'use dcterms:description' as part of the draft 
'application profile' but that's not the same as the ontology.


On 16/12/2013 09:50, Alexander Dutton wrote:
> Sorry for taking a while to respond; I'm using up holiday I'm required
> to take before Christmas.
>
> On 10/12/13 11:14, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
>> I suggest we align this very closely with dcat. eg. Use the same
>> spelling of Catalog and use foaf:primaryTopic to link the record to the
>> item.
> Good idea. Presumably it's worth claiming that the dcat properties are
> specializations of ours.
>
>> Do you mind if I mess with it?
> Not at all. I'm also wondering whether it's also worth adding a property
> for linking a catalogue to the primary SKOS notation datatype(s) for its
> records/items.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Buildingdata mailing list
> Buildingdata at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/buildingdata

-- 
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg

University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/buildingdata/attachments/20131216/61b04522/attachment.html