[Buildingdata] Re: Catalogues of stuff that's not data

[Alexander Dutton]

Sorry for taking a while to respond; I'm using up holiday I'm required
to take before Christmas.

On 10/12/13 11:14, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
> I suggest we align this very closely with dcat. eg. Use the same
> spelling of Catalog and use foaf:primaryTopic to link the record to the
> item.

Good idea. Presumably it's worth claiming that the dcat properties are
specializations of ours.

> Do you mind if I mess with it?

Not at all. I'm also wondering whether it's also worth adding a property
for linking a catalogue to the primary SKOS notation datatype(s) for its
records/items.

Regards,

Alex


-- 
Alexander Dutton
Linked Open Data Architect, Office of the CIO; data.ox.ac.uk, OxPoints
IT Services, University of Oxford, ℡ 01865 (6)13483

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/buildingdata/attachments/20131216/700ae11e/attachment.bin