[Buildingdata] Re: basic project data

[Fariz Darari]

Hi again Chris,

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Christopher Gutteridge
<cjg at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hmm. SWRC does look like it may well be exactly what I was looking for,
> although I'm not very keen on their reinventing the wheels of Event, Person,
> Organisation etc. but there's a bunch of useful looking predicates to
> plunder :) Thanks for the lead.

Well, one could say that the LinkedLab ontology is an upgrade for SWRC
:) Feel free to reuse it..

> It might also make sense to add a lead to the lab:programChair relations to
> programme.ecs.soton.ac.uk

I just figured out that programme.ecs.soton.ac.uk already had similar
terms such as prog:chair, prog:panel_member, and prog:organiser on the
Extension: People part. I wonder how you could add lab:programChair to
it..would you add it as a refinement (ie subproperties)?

> I have to say I like the choices in this. Would you be interested in adding
> some of it to openorg.ecs.soton.ac.uk? as some suggested patterns for people
> to follow if they want to represent such things?

Sure, guide me to do that :)

PS. Happy New Year, folks!

> On 30/12/2011 15:07, Fariz Darari wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I've got an ontology spec. about research community. You could check
>> it out on
>> http://www.slideshare.net/fadirra/linkedlab-ontology-specification
>> , or if you want a shortcut, just go to page 20 of the slides. Hope it
>> helps.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Fariz
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Christopher Gutteridge
>> <cjg at ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Anybody got any experience with (research) project data?
>>>
>>> I've got a group wanting to supply me with project name, description,
>>> people, start&  end dates.
>>>
>>>
>>> We knocked some stuff up for ECS, many years ago,
>>> http://rdf.ecs.soton.ac.uk/project/42
>>>
>>> (nb. it's got a php error at the top so won't parse... stupid database
>>> server...)
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if anybody has played around with anything. FOAF has some
>>> useful bits, as does AKT. CERIF CRIS looks more complicated than I
>>> really want to face, and is an XML standard, albeit with some people
>>> using RDF versions, but I can't see anything friendly.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>>>
>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog:
>>> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Buildingdata mailing list
>>> Buildingdata at ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/buildingdata
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>
> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>



-- 
Regards,
Fariz Darari
Universitas Indonesia