[Buildingdata] Re: Ex-buildings

[Alex Bilbie]

What about embedding the previous building's meta inside the new no.86 record under some sort of "previous structure" namespace?

Alex




On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:08, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:

> Yes...
> 
> 
> On 12/12/2011 14:57, Nick Gibbins wrote:
>> What happens when the University builds a new building with the
>> number 86?
>> 
>> Nick
>> 
>> On 12 Dec 2011, at 14:53, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
>> 
>>> I've just seen a portacabin building dismantled;
>>> http://data.southampton.ac.uk/building/86.html is gone!!
>>> 
>>> I'm wondering if it makes sense to have a class for ex-buildings, so
>>> that if something refers to it, it's explicitly a demolished building
>>> (well, carried away on trucks in our case) rather than just a 404.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>>> 
>>> / Lead Developer, EPrints Project, http://eprints.org/
>>> / Web Projects Manager, ECS, University of Southampton, http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
>>> / Webmaster, Web Science Trust, http://www.webscience.org/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Buildingdata mailing list
>>> Buildingdata at ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/buildingdata
> 
> -- 
> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
> 
> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Buildingdata mailing list
> Buildingdata at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/buildingdata