[BOAI] Re: The affordability problem vs. the accessibility problem

[Tevni Grajales]

Open Access assumptions in 1998-2001
This is not the old time press dependency (1530 to 1980) when there were no internet, neither fax and photocopy machines... when publishing was a very expensive enterprise that rightfully was used for profit. We are living the end of an Era. A new way to share information . Computers and internet makes today 'to publish and print" something very different.  The researcher buy  computer and software, work on research, write and rewrite the document following editorial standards in order to create a scholarly paper ready to be publish, peer-reviewers are not paid for their works, (otherwise advise me because I have been doing this for free during the last 15 years), publication and distribution by internet cost least....  etc.  It is time to be focus in knowledge advancement, human development, a "flat world" where equality and justice is promoted and common good is a real value.
TG
.

From: boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Allen Kleiman
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 4:09 PM
To: boai-forum at ecs.soton.ac.uk; 'AmericanScientist Open Access Forum'
Subject: [BOAI] Re: The affordability problem vs. the accessibility problem
Importance: High

Dear Knowing Sirs:
Is this a matter of 'commerce'?

Suppose I own a car and offer it for sale to a rental company with the verification of its reliability and safety by two or three mechanics of questionable qualifications and skill. However, I want to include a condition of sale that the buyer will make the car available to all the poor people in my town for free since they can't afford to pay for the rental.

When a Publisher offers to print an article -- certified by referees of questionable repute -- and absorb the cost of publication, distribution, and etc., isn't he entitled to retain the rights of sale?




________________________________
From: boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk> [mailto:boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk]<mailto:[mailto:boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk]> On Behalf Of Tevni Grajales
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 2:11 PM
To: boai-forum at ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:boai-forum at ecs.soton.ac.uk>; AmericanScientist Open Access Forum
Subject: [BOAI] Re: The affordability problem vs. the accessibility problem

Sorry, I did not realize that "information" could taken outside the context of the Budapest Open Access Initiative in this BOAI-forum. I was talking about " to make research articles in all academic fields freely available in the internet" (www.doaj.org<http://www.doaj.org>) . The point is FREELY AVAILABLE.  Do not miss the point, the open access initiative must be faithful to its origin and spirit.

Tevni

________________________________
to make research articles in all academic fields freely available on the internetFrom: boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk> [boai-forum-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk] on behalf of Stevan Harnad [amsciforum at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 12:51 PM
To: BOAI Forum; American Scientist Open Access Forum
Subject: [BOAI] Re: The affordability problem vs. the accessibility problem
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Allen Kleiman wrote:

> Is there a difference between 'access to information 'and 'access to the
> publishers copy'?

Yes, a lot:

(1) "Information" can mean any information: published, confidential, public, royalty-seeking, non-royalty-seeking, author give-away, non-author-giveaway.

(2) The primary target information of the OA movement is refereed research journal articles, all of which, without exception, are written exclusively for research uptake, usage and impact, not for royalty revenues.

(3) The restrictions (embargoes) that publishers place on OA self-archiving of the author's refereed, corrected, accepted final draft are far fewer than the restrictions on the publisher's version-or-record. (The publishers of over 60% of journals, including almost all the top journals in each field, already endorse OA self-archiving of the author's final draft -- but not the publisher's version-of-record -- immediately upon publication. These are called "green" publishers, and OA self-archiving is called "green OA.")

The OA movement is not -- and cannot be -- the movement for open access to all "information."

It is the movement for open access to refereed research journal articles.

The author's refereed, corrected, accepted final draft is the refereed journal article.

Access to the author's refereed, corrected, accepted final draft of a refereed journal article is the difference between night and day for all would-be users whose institutions cannot afford subscription access to the publisher's version of record.

This is why the first and most urgent priority of the OA movement is to ensure that all research institutions and funders mandate (require) the deposit of the author's refereed, corrected, accepted final draft of every refereed journal article in their institutional repository immediately upon publication (with access to the deposit immediately set as Open Access for at least 60% of the deposits from green journals, and the repository's semi-automated "email eprint request" Button providing "Almost OA" to the remaining 40% for individuals requesting access for research purposes.semi-automatically with two key-presses, at the discretion of the author).

Stevan Harnad


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/boai-forum/attachments/20111107/2336e951/attachment.html