[BOAI] Hybrid journal pricing (1): Impending Oxford Open price increases

Peter Suber peters at earlham.edu
Tue Oct 20 20:51:10 BST 2009


[Forwarding from Bernd-Christoph Kaemper.  --Peter Suber.]


Hybrid journal pricing (1): Impending Oxford Open price increases

You are satisfied that Oxford University Press takes the mixed revenue 
model for their hybrid Oxford Open program seriously and reduces prices for 
e-only site licenses for some of their journals in response to increased 
Open Access uptake? Don't cheer too soon:

 From Dec 2009, author publication charges for your scientists will 
increase by 40% in GBP or EUR and 25% in USD, for all journals in the 
Oxford Open program for which your library maintains a local online 
subscription [13].

Oxford Open, the hybrid journal program of OUP, carefully designed as a 
controlled experiment and case study [1-4], continues to evolve and adjust 
its pricing model.

OUP promises to (and actually does) adjust the e-only price for its hybrid 
journals in order to "reflect the amount of open access versus non-open 
access content published within each journal" during the last completed 
year when setting its annual prices, and this has resulted in some Oxford 
Open journals experiencing a price reduction to the online-only 
subscription, cf. the explanations and examples provided in [5-11]. We have 
recently analysed the 2010 price list [15], and the 2010 OA % adjustment 
ranges from 0% up to 28% (2009: 0%... 24%), with 8 titles at 16% and above, 
20 titles in the range 8%...15%, 33 titles in the range 1...7% and 25 
titles with no adjustment, median adjustment was 4% (2009: 2%), average 
(aggregate) adjustment 7% (2009: 5%), relative to the 2010 online only 
price without adjustment which may be derived from the print only and 
combined prices that are not adjusted. Actual price decreases relative to 
2009 range up to 14%, but there are also price increases up to 33% and the 
median decrease is only 1% in GBP/EUR and 2% in USD, the aggregate decrease 
1.3% resp. 2.7%.

It may be instructive to compare prices for the journal with the largest OA 
uptake, Bioinformatics. From 2005 to 2010, online only price changed from 
GBP 1008 to GBP 976 or EUR 1512 to 1464 (-3%), and USD 1714 to 1951 (+14%, 
the company exchange rate used for USD/GBP was 1,7 in 2005, and 2.0 for 
2010). In contrast, during the same years, combined subscription rates for 
print plus online increased from GBP 1120 to 1626 or ca. EUR 1680 to 2439 
(+45%), and from USD 1904 to 3252 (+71%).

There is one peculiar case, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative 
Medicine (eCAM), where OUP has abandoned the 2009 OA adjustment for the 
online only version, thereby doubling its price for 2010. OUP claims that 
INMPRC's 10 year sponsorship grant for eCAM (which helped to start the 
journal in 2004) has ended which seems strange (requests by this author to 
both the editor in chief and the managing editor to confirm this remained 
unanswered). In 2007 eCAM moved from fully sponsored to a subscription 
based model for non-research articles. For 2008 eCAM announced a change in 
its OA policy: while all original research articles would continue to be 
published open access (costs then presumably still being covered by the 
sponsorship grant), "Reviews, editorials, commentaries and all other 
articles excluding original articles will be published as standard 
articles, available to subscribers of the journal. However, the journal 
will participate in the Oxford Open program, and authors may choose to pay 
the Oxford Open charges in order to have their articles published as open 
access articles." eCAM has ca. 55% original research and 45% other 
articles. For the latter, access is subscription based, if authors do not 
opt in to pay for OA. Apparently they do, because the journal is nearly 
100% OA (almost all articles carry a cc-by-nc license, and the two reviews 
(3%) from 2008, that did not were still labelled with 'Free Full Text'). So 
it is a mystery to us why OUP has abandoned the OA % adjustment: even if 
original research articles were no longer sponsored through INMPRC, most of 
the rest is being paid for by author charges. We do not know whether any 
library actually pays for the online version - as this journal is 97% open 
access and 100% free access, there is no need to do so except as a 
voluntary sponsorship.

Since its inception, in addition OUP has used an incentive to keep 
libraries subscribing to these hybrid journals by offering a lower author 
publication charge for corresponding authors based at institutions with a 
full price online subscription to the journal. At the same time this helped 
to make the Oxford Open option more attractive to authors at those 
institutions and provided an incentive for authors to try it out.

It has to be taken into account here that the majority of Oxford Open 
journals are not excluded from collection deals for consortia. However, 
reduced article processing fees apply only to fully paid subscriptions not 
titles one might get via cross access or additional access with in 
consortia collection deals.

 From the Oxford Open FAQ [14], 
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/faq/oxford_open.html

"Why is there a mixed model of funding under the Oxford Open model?"

"We have chosen this model in consultation with authors and librarians. The 
ability of authors to pay publication charges is highly dependent on 
sponsoring agencies and research institutions making the necessary changes 
to their funding processes so that authors have the funds at their disposal.

For this reason we believe that any transition to an author-funded open 
access model will need to occur gradually. We hope that you will support 
the Oxford Open initiative by maintaining your online subscriptions to give 
your researchers who wish to publish in the journal in question the option 
of paying reduced author charges, should they choose to have their paper 
made freely available online. By doing this we hope to establish an 
accessible charging initiative that will actively encourage funding 
agencies to make further resources available for publication."

Nevertheless, with a mixed revenue model like this, if we assume that the 
full Open Access Charge is in the order of that required to sustain the 
journals if they were to move to full open access without subscriptions 
[4], the reduced rates are bound to increase, as OA uptake increases and 
subscription rates are adjusted downwards correspondingly. I did not see 
this effect mentioned in the various articles outlining the prospects for 
pricing within the Oxford Open program, but it now becomes quite obvious.

The discount for authors from subscribing institutions has been reduced 
twice in the 5 years since program start, i.e. from

47% in 2005-2007 : GBP 800 / USD 1500 / EUR 1200 vs. GBP 1500 / USD 2800 / 
EUR 2250 to
40% in 2008-2009 : GBP 900 / USD 1800 / EUR 1350 vs. GBP 1500 / USD 3000 / 
EUR 2250, and now to
25% in 2010- : GBP 1275 / USD 2250 / EUR 1900 vs. GBP 1700 / USD 3000 / EUR 
2550

So for 2010 OUP increases author publication charges for authors from 
subscribing institutions drastically, by over 40% in GBP and EUR, and 25% 
in USD. In the 5 years since the inception of the program, APCs for 
institutional subscribers have increased by 60% (USD 50%) which amounts to 
an annual increase of 10% (USD 8,5%). If this were intended to shift money 
from subscription fees to OA funding, and to limit any loss due to a higher 
OA uptake, it would be clearly driven only by the needs of the journals 
with the highest current OA uptake (near 30%). Given the multiple other 
means of revenue increase used by OUP, it seems doubtful whether such a 
large increase is really necessary, especially if it is applied to all 
journals, even those with very low OA uptake. Interestingly, for Nucleic 
Acids Research (NAR) Richardson [3] reported a substantial reduction in 
cost per article from 2002 to 2005 (from GBP 2700 to ca. GBP 1750), 
attributed to economies of scale, together with an "aggressive efficiency 
drive which has increased speed of publication whilst reducing cost."

How many institutions and their authors will be affected by this price 
increase? One would guess that a major part of submissions willing to pay 
for open access to their paper would come from institutions that also hold 
a subscription to the journal in question, also because the full open 
access charge might seem prohibitive to many authors. For the Oxford Open 
Journal with the highest OA uptake, Bioinformatics, this is indeed the 
case. In 2006, 87% of authors choosing the Open access option for 
Bioinformatics were eligible for the subscriber rates [11], and the press 
release reporting the first full-year results from Oxford Open [5] quoted a 
percentage of 80% overall. The converse could also be true: given the bonus 
model above, any institution that is paying author publication charges on 
behalf of its authors is better off, when it holds also a subscription, 
mostly already with 1 pub/year, and certainly with 2 or 3. Thus, library 
subscriptions may serve to support lower publication charges for authors.

Full Author publication charges (for authors from institutions that do not 
have a fully paid subscription) increase also, for the first time in 5 
years, by 13% in GBP and EUR while remaining unchanged in USD - the latter 
possibly reflects that the GBP has lost in value compared to the USD; that 
it has also lost compared to the EUR is conveniently ignored by OUP.

Similar, when OUP speaks of "exchange rate adjustments", these are 
apparently made to offset the loss effects of currency devaluations for the 
company, not to bring company rates in better accord with actual exchange 
rates. E.g, for some US based titles we see in 2010 price increases by 33% 
because OUP prefers to use a "company rate" of 1.0 USD/EUR instead of 1.33 
(a result of switching from 2,0 USD/GBP to a more current exchange rate of 
1,5 while leaving the EUR/GBP conversion rate unchanged at 1,5 GBP/EUR). On 
the other hand, OUP UK titles continue to be sold in the USA at 2,0 USD/GBP 
and in Europe at 1,5 EUR/GBP, even though the pound has lost 20...25%.

Therefore, institutions from USA and Canada (charged in USD) and Europe 
outside UK (charged in EUR) would have been far better off for 2010, had 
OUP - instead of announcing a "price freeze" on e-only, had increased 
prices normally but then also adjusted the company exchange rates (20...25% 
downwards) as it did conversely in previous years when the GBP was still 
getting stronger in relation to the USD (2005: 1,7, 2006: 1,8, 2007: 1.8, 
2008: 1,95, 2009: 2,0, 2010: 2,0). (That the failure to do so was not 
necessarily related to the "price freeze" only, is apparent from the fact 
that OUP did neither take into account the loss of the GBP against the EUR 
in setting 2009 prices, the conversion rate has been kept at 1,5 since 
2006). So this is a clear example of what we know as "exchange rate 
profiteering" (raise the conversion rate as long as it can be justified by 
an increasing exchange rate, but leave it unchanged for years if the 
exchange rate falls back).

In this context it is interesting that we have here another publisher 
believing that it is compatible with EU competition regulations to charge 
markedly higher prices for non UK customers within the EU, using artificial 
"company exchange rates" that are far from actual exchange rates, while at 
the same hindering agencies to buy services at UK prices for reselling to 
to non UK customers. A premise that in our opinion is worth contesting.

In summary, it appears that OUP makes up for the 2010 "price freeze" on 
e-only subscriptions by price increases of 10% on print and 14% on combined 
subscriptions [12] plus price increases of 13% resp. 41% on author charges 
for its Oxford Open program, plus avoiding the need to adjust EUR and USD 
conversion rates to GBP by 20...25% downwards for non-US titles. Not 
exactly helpful ...

In implementing a cautious transition strategy towards more OA and away 
from Print OUP has certainly been successful so far. They are also one of 
the few hybrid publishers who actually make adjustments to their hybrid 
journals depending on OA uptake, and carefully document the progress of 
their experiments in OA publishing. However, based on our findings above, 
librarians and university administrators should clearly not indulge in 
illusions about direct savings for their institutions; and those who are 
going to save are institutions that do not publish in a particular Oxford 
Open journal they subscribe to (or, paradoxically, those who choose not to 
publish OA via the golden route, as long as they at least self-archive). 
Article processing charges so far seem to spiral up in the same way as 
subscription charges did in the past. We are in a transition period, and it 
is still too early to make predictions. Nevertheless, what we see here 
indicates that there is now more money on the table for paying article 
processing charges in certain fields for gold OA publishing in established 
journals and OUP must think that price elasticity of demand for gold OA is 
low enough to allow adjustments such as those described above (or perhaps 
this is just another facette of their carefully designed longterm 
experiment with hybrid OA models). Whether this will not throw back OA 
uptake for 2010 remains to be seen.

Bernd-Christoph Kaemper,
Stuttgart University Library


References:

[1] David Worlock, OUP: OA In The World Of Intelligent Experiment,
in: EPS Insights, February 24, 2006
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/eps%20insights%2024%20february%202006%20-%20oup.pdf

[2] Martin Ruchardson: Open access: evidence-based policy or policy-based 
evidence?
The university press perspective, in: Serials 18(1), March 2005, 35-37, 
DOI:10.1629/1835
http://uksg.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&issn=0953-0460&volume=18&issue=1&spage=35

[3] Martin Richardson: Open access and institutional repositories: an evidence-
based approach, in: Serials 18(2), July 2005, 98-103, DOI:10.1629/1898
http://uksg.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&issn=0953-0460&volume=18&issue=2&spage=98

[4] Claire Saxby: The Bioinformatics Open Access option, Editorial,
in: Bioinformatics, Vol. 21 no. 22, 2005, p. 4071-4072, 
DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti707
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/long/21/22/4071

[5] Press release, 30 August 2006
Full year results from Oxford Open show wide variation in open access 
uptake across disciplines, 
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/2006/08/30/full_year_results_from_oxford_op.html

[6] Richard Gedye: Open about open access: we share preliminary findings 
from our open access experiments, in: Oxford Journals Update for 
Librarians, Issue 2, Winter 2006
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/for_librarians/update_winter06.pdf

[7] Presentation slides, Audio of Panel discussion and final report, 
"Asessing the impact
of open access: Preliminary findings from Oxford Journals", presented at 
the Oxford
open access workshop, June 2006, 
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/oa_workshop.htm

[8] Kate Stringer, Oxford Journals open access pricing adjustments,
posted to liblicense-l, Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:28:30 EDT, 
http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0708/msg00050.html

cf. also comment by Peter Suber on an earlier liblicense-l announcement,
Oxford reduces prices on 28 hybrid journals
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2007/07/oxford-reduces-prices-on-26-hybrid.html

[9] Martin Richardson: Oxford Open prices adjusted for open access uptake,
in: Oxford Journals Update for Librarians, Issue 2, Winter 2007/2008
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/for_librarians/oxford_open.pdf

[10] Mandy Hill: Oxford Open prices adjusted for third year in a row,
in: Oxford Journals Update for Librarians, Autumn 2008
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/for_librarians/update_autumn08.pdf

[11] Claire Bird: Case Study: Oxford Journals' adventures in open access,
in: Learned Publishing 21 No. 3 (July 2008), 200-208), DOI: 
10.1087/095315108X288910
http://alpsp.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/alpsp/lp/2008/00000021/00000003/art00006

[12] Martin Richardson: Oxford Journals makes a change to its pricing policy,
in: Oxford Journals Update for Librarians, Autumn 2009
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/for_librarians/update_summer09.pdf

[13] Oxford Open Pricing. New charges -- for all papers accepted on or 
after 1 December 2009, 
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/oxfordopen/charges.html#New... [visited Mon, 
Oct 19, 2009]

[14] Oxford Journals / Frequently Asked Questions: Oxford Open,
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/faq/oxford_open.html

[15] The data for this paper have been compiled in the spreadsheet
http://www.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/ejournals/OUP_2010_online-only_price_adjustments.xls

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/boai-forum/attachments/20091020/2984c686/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Boai-forum mailing list